1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sequence on a circle

  1. Dec 11, 2005 #1
    I've got some questions to the following task.

    Let [itex]r\in\mathbb{Q}[/itex]. Determine the partial limits of the complex sequence [itex](z_n)[/itex] defined by [itex]z_n=e^{i2\pi{rn}}[/itex].

    There is also a hint given: Set [itex]r=\frac{p}{q}[/itex] with [itex]p\in\mathbb{Z},q\in\mathbb{N}\setminus{\{0\}[/itex], so that the fraction [itex]\frac{p}{q}[/itex] is irreducible. From [itex]\frac{p}{q}\alpha\in\mathbb{Z},\alpha\in\mathbb{Z}[/itex] then follows [itex]\frac{\alpha}{q}\in\mathbb{Z}[/itex].

    Every complex number is a point of the complex plane and can be written as:
    [itex]cos(t)+i\\sin(t)=e^{it}[/itex], so the defined sequence elements can be rewritten as: [itex]z_n={e^{i2\pi{rn}}=cos(n\cdot{2\pi\frac{p}{q}})+i\\sin(n\cdot{2\pi\frac{p}{q})=(cos({2\pi\frac{p}{q}})+i\\sin(2\pi\frac{p}{q}))^n[/itex]
    From the equation it's pretty clear that we're dealing with the q-th roots of 1 in the complex, and that p<q, because we have q points in the complex plane, whose radius-vectors are at angle fewer or equals than 2*pi*p. If we add the factor n, we increase the angle of each radius-vector of a particular point (with given p/q) n-fold. Is it right?
    Now, I don't know at the moment how to get to the partial sequences. I can't see how the hint could help. It says that alpha is greater-equals q, but why should it be so in our case (I mean q=3/4 for example, then alpha could still be 1,2,3, couldn't it?...we would still get some points)? If it must in fact be greater-equals q and alpha/q is an integer, then does it mean that we could take all elements with indices, which are multiple of q, to get a subsequence?
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 11, 2005 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    All you need to do in general is to write the sequence as a disjoint union of convergent sequences*. Of course in general that is disingenuous since that might be hard.

    But in this case, let's take p=1 q=4 for this example. What is the sequence? i,-1,-i,1,i,-1,-i,1,....

    so the only limit of subsequences are 1,-1,i,-i. Notice that the behaviour is going to be repeated....

    * proof of claim. If we can split z_n into distinct convergent subsequences each converging to *different* things and such that every term of z_n is in one of the convergent subsequences, then the limits of these subsequences are all of the accumulation points. Why: if x_m is a convergent subsequence it must eventually lie wholly in one of these distinct subsequences otherwise infinitely many of the x_m's would lie in one subsequence and infinitely many would lie in another, ie x_m would have two subsequences converging to different things, contradicting the assumption x_m is convergent.
  4. Dec 11, 2005 #3
    I have a subtle feeling that the accumulation points are in fact i,-1,-i,1, for if we take p/q sufficently large...say p/q<p'/q', for the same n, arg(z') with p'/q' will be larger than arg(z) with p/q. Is it right? But this means p/q must grow together with n, doesn't it?....which doesn't fit in together with the given assumption that r is arbitrary but fixed...Have messed everything up?:rolleyes:

    ...something else:
    in my first post below I actually identified alpha with n, though I didn't say this as it occurs to me now...sorry for that. So the hint says that n should divide q. And I can't get to what exent it should bring us further.
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2005
  5. Dec 11, 2005 #4

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    p and q are fixed; they can't grow with n. What are you getting at? Are you saying that you think the accumulation points are ALWAYS 1,-1,i,-i? cos they aren't, just think of the case r=1, when the series is the constant series 1,1,1,1..

    Look, just try a few examples for different r (ie different p and q) and see what's going on try fixing p=1, q=2,3,4,5,6 to begin with and try spotting a pattern. Hint: remember that any n in Z can be written uniquely as aq+b for 0<=b<q (assuming q is positive, which we can).
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook