1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Series converging to |x|

  1. Nov 26, 2011 #1
    Hi everyone,

    I need to show that [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty}P_n(x) = |x|[/tex] uniformly on [tex][-1,1][/tex]
    if we define [tex]P_0 = 0[/tex] & [tex]P_{n+1} = P_n(x) + \frac{x^2 - P_n^2(x)}{2}[/tex]

    Rudin gives the following hint: use the identity [tex]|x| - P_{n+1}(x) = \left( |x| - P_n(x) \right) \left( 1 - \frac{|x|+P_n(x)}{2} \right)[/tex]
    to show that
    [tex]0 \leq P_n(x) \leq P_{n+1}(x) \leq |x|[/tex]
    if [tex]|x| \leq 1[/tex]
    and that [tex]|x|-P_n(x) \leq |x| \left( 1-\frac{|x|}{2} \right)^n < \frac{2}{n+1}[/tex]
    if [tex]|x| \leq 1[/tex] (though I think that's a typo, he probably meant greater than or equal)

    From there I could readily show that the difference |x| - P_n goes to 0 when n goes to infinity.
    But I'm not sure how to go about this problem. I would use recursion on n, and I was advised to consider the fact that the arithmetic average is always less or = than the highest term that enters the average (dunno how to use this fact here).

    Any help would be appreciated.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 26, 2011 #2

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    It's not a typo. You are always working with x in [-1,1].

    So, where exactly are you stuck?? Can you show that "idenitity"? Can you show that

    [tex]0\leq P_n(x)\leq P_{n+1}(x)\leq |x|[/tex]

    Can you show that

    [tex]|x|-P_n(x)\leq \frac{2}{n+1}[/tex]

    Which of these three doesn't work?
     
  4. Nov 26, 2011 #3
    Ok well I was able to show that [tex] P_n(x) \leq |x| [/tex] by recursion on n for all natural numbers n by using the given identity and the fact about the average that I mentioned. But not that P_n is less than P_n+1 yet, couldn't get the inductive step to work out the way I want (my inductive hypothesis being that there exist a natural number k such that P_k < P_k+1 and from there I'm trying to show that P_k+1 < P_k+2.

    Also, my bad regarding the inequality with |x|, it's obv not a typo considering the interval we're working on.
     
  5. Nov 26, 2011 #4

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    OK, so you need to show that

    [tex]P_n(x)\leq P_{n+1}(x)[/tex]

    Writing out [itex]P_{n+1}(x)[/itex], you get that you need to show

    [tex]P_n(x)\leq P_n(x)+\frac{x^2-P_n^2(x)}{2}.[/tex]

    So, what can you do next??
     
  6. Nov 26, 2011 #5
    Oh well that follows directly from the fact that [tex] P_n(x) \leq |x| [/tex] Ok thanks a lot. I will try to prove the second inequality now.
     
  7. Nov 26, 2011 #6
    Still can't get the second part. Tried something with the binomial expansion to show that
    [tex] |x| \left( 1-\frac{|x|}{2} \right)^n < \frac{2}{n+1}[/tex]
    but I can't relate my result to 2/(n+1).

    Also would you use recursion to show that [tex]|x|-P_n(x) \leq |x| \left( 1-\frac{|x|}{2} \right)^n [/tex] ?

    EDIT: Just got the above inequality, I will try again the one with 2/(n+1).
     
  8. Nov 27, 2011 #7

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Why don't you try to find the maximum of

    [tex] |x| \left( 1-\frac{|x|}{2} \right)^n [/tex]

    by calculus?? Calculate the derivative and see what the critical points are (= where the derivative is 0 or does not exist)
     
  9. Nov 28, 2011 #8
    Got it, thanks a lot for your help.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Series converging to |x|
Loading...