- #1
QuantumClue
- 160
- 0
All elements in [tex]\mathcal{A}[/tex] match all elements of [tex]\mathcal{B}[/tex]. The order of the information in [tex]\mathcal{B}[/tex] is important to understand the dynamics of the information. [tex]\mathcal{A}[/tex] does not have a logical order of information. However [tex]\mathcal{B}[/tex] does have a logical order. Because there is no order in [tex]\mathcal{A}[/tex] there is no proper intersection.
What I want to know is if there is any way to express the statement [tex]\mathcal{A}[/tex] has no mathematical order of information in it's Set, but still has all [tex]\mathcal{M} \in \mathcal{B}[/tex] where [tex]\mathcal{M}[/tex] is to denote its members?
Thanks
What I want to know is if there is any way to express the statement [tex]\mathcal{A}[/tex] has no mathematical order of information in it's Set, but still has all [tex]\mathcal{M} \in \mathcal{B}[/tex] where [tex]\mathcal{M}[/tex] is to denote its members?
Thanks