Given the following four statements concerning the student body at CU:
b) There are no women engineering students at CU
The Attempt at a Solution
Let W be the set of all women
Let E be the set of all engineering students
However I don't know valid the first, and therefore the second statement is. In the book I'm using, it doesn't cover any "not a subset" other than complimentary.
However, to conclude that all non-women are engineers seems fallacious. Or is that the point?
Is is valid to say:
The set of all women are in the set of non-engineering students.
It's not really homework for a class, but is homework style.