Settling on the Moon

  • Thread starter @PK nd
  • Start date
  • #76
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,701
4,382
The main problem will be the low gravity. Astronauts/cosmonauts in 0 g for long periods experience bone mass loss, blood loss, and muscle atrophy. A permanent colony would either have to be centrifuged or force everyone to work out in a centrifuge fairly often.
But how bad are those health problems in 1/6th G and not zero G?
 
  • #77
3,379
942
I would imagine that loss of bone and similar would still be a problem, just that it would be somewhat less aggressive and so would take longer for it to get to the point of becoming disabling.
 
  • #78
33,780
9,503
Testing that would be one of the scientific goals of a manned base on moon. It is probably a reasonable guess that 1/6 g is better than zero g, so one year should be possible, maybe more. 437 days is the record in zero-g, and we'll have 6 spaceflights of at least one year duration next March.
 
  • #79
136
23
A staged approach to a Mars landing and then base, with an ion drive to reduce transit time, would make more sense than a lunar settlement. Send an unmanned ascent vehicle so Mars-nauts can get from Mars to orbit, and a habitat with laboratory. Both would start processing Martian atmosphere to make oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, water, single-malt Scotch, all ready for the new Martians. The habitat would stay, even if the first Mars-nauts returned to earth. Oh, take some 3D printers, along with a world library of literature, music, science. Buzz Aldrin outlined a staged approach a few years ago, except he's a whiskey man. :cool:
 

Related Threads for: Settling on the Moon

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
48
Views
11K
Top