Should Shipman have been allowed to commit suicide?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brewnog
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Harold Shipman, a convicted mass murderer who took his own life in prison, should have been prevented from committing suicide. Participants express mixed views on the issue. Some argue that since Shipman showed no signs of suicidal behavior, it was not reasonable to blame authorities for his suicide. Others contend that allowing a mass murderer to end his life saves taxpayers money associated with his imprisonment. The conversation touches on the broader implications of suicide, individual rights, and the responsibilities of prison systems to manage inmates. There is a consensus that while efforts should be made to prevent suicide, ultimately, individuals should have the autonomy to make such decisions, especially in the context of a life sentence for severe crimes. The discussion also raises questions about the ethics of punishment and the societal implications of allowing convicted criminals the means to end their lives.
brewnog
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,750
Reaction score
8
I don't know if this was discussed a while back (my search couldn't find anything about it), but the death penalty thread made me consider this.

Should Harold Shipman have been prevented from committing suicide?

Shipman was a medical doctor who was jailed for murdering 15 patients, and was later found to have killed between 215 and 260 patients. He hanged himself in his prison cell in January 2004.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3391871.stm

Many people feel that he should not have been allowed the means with which he ended his own life, I am glad that he's no longer draining my taxes in all the costs associated with imprisonment. Discuss.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well i don't know who teh guy is, but..

""He was showing no signs whatsoever of pre-suicidal behaviour at all," she said.

"He was behaving utterly normally. He was working as normal and doing education as normal.

"There was absolutely no indication that this was coming and he was giving no cause for concern." "

Thats all i really need to know. If no one thought he was going ot kill himself, then i wouldn't define it as "they let him commit suicide". Its like a child in a 2 story home. If the child goes upstairs and jumps out an open window and dies, its not right to say "why did the parents let the kid commit suicide". If the kid/this guy didnt show any suicidal tendencies, then oh well... can't really read peoples minds.
 
I seriously think that anyone should be allowed to commit suicide as long as they make arrangements before hand and don't make a mess. I've lost a few friends that way, and the part that always bothers me is in not knowing why or if I could have helped them out and made it unnecessary. As for escaping justice... why is it that the death penalty is considered the ultimate sentence, and yet suicided prisoners are considered to have done so?
 
Danger said:
I seriously think that anyone should be allowed to commit suicide as long as they make arrangements before hand and don't make a mess. I've lost a few friends that way, and the part that always bothers me is in not knowing why or if I could have helped them out and made it unnecessary.

er.. you lost friends through suicide yet you think that they should be allowed to anyway as long as they don't make a mess?

I would do all within my power to keep my friends from committing suicide in the first place.
 
I follow the ideology that you should be able to do whatever you want as long as it's not at somebody else's expense. Suicide seems to fit into that category quite nicely, so I have no problems with it.

Of course I would try to talk someone out of suicide, but I'm not going to tackle them or lock them up "for their own good"; that's just crazy.
 
Last edited:
I don't think people quite got this.

The guy was a convicted mass murderer, serving a life sentence. ShawnD, for him not to have commited suicide would have been at the taxpayers' expense to the order of a few hundred thousand pounds per year. He was already locked up.

Should people who are supposed to be living the rest of their days in a prison cell be deprived of any items with which they could reasonably improvise suicide apparatus?
 
Why should I care if a mass murderer spends his prison years in misery, or if he sits in his dark cell gloating over his evil deeds?

What I care about is to be sure that individual is never again able to commit further atrocities; I have no patience with persons who display a pathological eagerness to inflict pain upon others, whether or not that pain-infliction is illegitimate as in a crime, or "legitimate" as in meting out "punishment".

Just to clarify my view: Good riddance, Dr. Shipman.
 
I think it would be hard to deprive someone of the means to commit suicide without infringing on human rights. What could you do, short of fully restraining every prisoner in a padded room? If someone is so set on killing themselves, then it would take some pretty drastic measures to stop them.
 
brewnog said:
Should people who are supposed to be living the rest of their days in a prison cell be deprived of any items with which they could reasonably improvise suicide apparatus?
Why? Their killing themselves saves tax payers a lot of money. I bet most of the victims families were pushing for the death penalty anyway.
 
Back
Top