Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Should top Universities engage in nonstring QG research

  1. May 4, 2017 #41

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Don't defend your nonsense by hiding behind your anonymous "other physicists". You made a factually incorrect statement. You've made that same incorrect statement in the past. I'm asking you not to keep making it.
     
  2. May 4, 2017 #42
    fine, the latest LHC results strongly disfavor natural susy
     
  3. May 4, 2017 #43

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    That's not true either, and indeed, it's only slightly less false.
     
  4. May 4, 2017 #44
    are you familiar with the latest SUSY results ?

    What would be a sentence that you consider to be "true"
     
  5. May 4, 2017 #45

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Yes, I am familiar with the latest SUSY results.

    I asked you not to keep making false statements. You're arguing with that. Your choice, I guess.
     
  6. May 4, 2017 #46
    what would be a "true" statement regarding natural SUSY and latest results + electron EDM
     
  7. May 5, 2017 #47

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    First, that's not what this thread is about.
    Second, my goal is not to waste screen after screen trying to explain something to you. It's to get you to stop posting things that are untrue.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Should top Universities engage in nonstring QG research
Loading...