- #1
- 558
- 0
Intelligence reports tell us Mexico are secretly developing WMD's to be used against US.
Should US invade Mexico to prevent an attack in advance?
Should US invade Mexico to prevent an attack in advance?
Last edited:
How about comic relief then? Perhaps this thread belongs in GD.russ_watters said:How is irony a legitimate discussion topic? I don't see the point of this.
The same intelligence that brought us Bush? :rofl:Pengwuino said:I wonder what "intelligence" brought this thread up.
Astronuc said:How about comic relief then? Perhaps this thread belongs in GD.
Astronuc said:I don't know any personally.
EL, the deal was I would re-open the thread IF you posted what your point was, which is Mexico has oil, so why haven't we invaded Mexico. We don't create threads here with no content and tell people to "read between the lines". You blew it.EL said:So, I see about 100% of you havn't got my point. I'll be back soon to continue this discussion, meanwhile please read between the lines. Why did I choose Mexico? And isn't it funny this thread got locked because I couldn't prove my claim about WMD's! Since when do we need that?
The purpose of the US invading Mexico would depend on the specific reasons and motivations behind such an action. Historically, countries have invaded other countries for reasons such as expanding their territory, gaining resources or strategic advantages, or responding to threats or attacks. It is important to carefully consider the potential consequences and justifications before making the decision to invade another country.
The legality of a US invasion of Mexico would depend on a variety of factors, including international laws and treaties, as well as the justification and reasoning behind the invasion. In general, the United Nations Charter prohibits the use of force against another country except in cases of self-defense or with authorization from the UN Security Council. Without a clear legal justification, a US invasion of Mexico could be seen as a violation of international law.
An invasion of Mexico by the US would likely have a significant impact on the relationship between the two countries. It could potentially strain diplomatic relations, lead to economic consequences, and cause long-term resentment and mistrust between the two nations. Additionally, the US would likely face backlash and condemnation from the international community for such an action.
The consequences of a US invasion of Mexico could be far-reaching and unpredictable. It could result in significant loss of life and destruction of infrastructure in both countries, as well as lead to political instability and humanitarian crises. The US could also face retaliation and backlash from other countries, and potentially damage its reputation as a global leader and defender of human rights.
Before considering an invasion, it is important to exhaust all other possible alternatives and solutions to address the issues between the US and Mexico. This could include diplomatic negotiations, economic sanctions, or working with international organizations to find a peaceful resolution. In most cases, there are more effective and less destructive ways to address conflicts between countries without resorting to military intervention.