- #1
William Clark
I have reasons that have convinced me that Mars would be better, but I want to know what everybody else thinks.
Why? And please post peer reviewed scientific published papers only as your sources.William Clark said:I have reasons that have convinced me that Mars would be better, but I want to know what everybody else thinks.
I see no reason why we would colonize either, as we understand the meaning of the word. Will we ever establish a long-term/permanent base for the purpose of scientific research, or providing mission resources, on either the moon or Mars, or both? Probably. Will we ever send settlers to the moon or Mars to establish political control, a.k.a. "colonize?" Not in the foreseeable future.William Clark said:I have reasons that have convinced me that Mars would be better, but I want to know what everybody else thinks.
phion said:Logically, I think we'd have to set up some kind of forward base on the moon before we could maintain any kind of consistent transport of supply to mars.
phion said:Logically, I think we'd have to set up some kind of forward base on the moon before we could maintain any kind of consistent transport of supply to mars.
DiracPool said:Why is that? Don’t you think we’d have to get the supplies out of Earth’s gravity well first in either case? Then we are going to have to re-launch them from the moon?
Actually, fuel, oxygen, water, and other resources can be produced on the moon and supplied to a spacecraft in space at a fraction of the cost it would cost to launch the same resources from Earth. That would also reduce the costs of launching from Earth as well, since those resources will not have be launched from Earth.DiracPool said:Why is that? Don’t you think we’d have to get the supplies out of Earth’s gravity well first in either case? Then we are going to have to re-launch them from the moon?
Private Mars Colony Project May Not Be Feasible, Study SuggestsMuti said:Any way do someone know what experts think between moon or Mars for colonizing?
Evo said:Private Mars Colony Project May Not Be Feasible, Study Suggests
http://www.space.com/27451-private-mars-colony-feasibility-study.html
Evo said:Why? And please post peer reviewed scientific published papers only as your sources.
See my reply above, in GD, if the papers are from valid, known sources, I'll allow them, I just don't want any mass media or pop-sci stuff.micromass said:It's not what you asked for:
Shall I delete the NASA paper also since it's posted on a blog?micromass said:Then I would like you to post the original source instead of an article saying what the source says.
Here you go. http://www.iafastro.net/iac/paper/id/24778/summary/micromass said:Then I would like you to post the original source instead of an article saying what the source says.
You're very welcome, I should have posted the original study, but didn't since it was GD and the article was from a good source, anyway members always have the right to request the original source.micromass said:Thank you very much!
I think an article from a credible journalistic source, which reports a scientific study, and in the case of MIT, it is likely reviewed before publishing, is reasonable.Evo said:You're very welcome, I should have posted the original study, but didn't since it was GD and the article was from a good source, anyway members always have the right to request the original source.
The main benefit of colonizing the Moon or Mars is the potential for scientific advancement. Both celestial bodies have unique environments and resources that can be studied and utilized for further exploration and understanding of our universe. Additionally, colonizing either the Moon or Mars could serve as a backup plan for humanity in case of a disaster on Earth.
2.In terms of feasibility, colonizing the Moon is generally seen as more achievable in the near future. This is because the Moon is closer to Earth and we have already sent multiple missions there, giving us more information and knowledge about its environment. However, with advancements in technology and further research, colonizing Mars may become more feasible in the future.
3.One of the main challenges of colonizing the Moon or Mars is the harsh environment. Both have extreme temperatures, lack of breathable air, and high levels of radiation. This would require advanced technology and resources to create habitable and sustainable living conditions. Additionally, the distance from Earth could pose challenges for communication, resupply missions, and emergency situations.
4.Colonizing the Moon or Mars would have a minimal impact on their environments, as they are not currently inhabited by any life forms. However, any human activity and potential terraforming on these celestial bodies could alter their ecosystems and geological processes. It is important to consider the potential consequences and carefully plan any colonization efforts to minimize negative impacts.
5.There is no clear answer to this question, as it ultimately depends on the goals and priorities of the colonization efforts. Some argue that the Moon should be colonized first because of its proximity and potential for scientific research, while others believe that Mars should be the priority due to its potential for long-term sustainability. Ultimately, both the Moon and Mars offer unique opportunities for exploration and advancement, and it may be beneficial to pursue colonization efforts on both simultaneously.