Shouldn't it float?

Main Question or Discussion Point

shouldn't it float??

if one recalls the old classical physics terms namely repose angle, i've got a problem for them.
as it(repose angle) is meant for is a state when a matter lying on an inclined plane with a repose angle to ground ... then there will be equilibrium between the frictional and gravitational force.... so in such case why does the mass slide down instead of floating? and that too with "SOME" CONSTANT speed?
as far as i think .. it should be floating..
any help there? thanks
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

brewnog
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,701
7
Could you elaborate on that please?
 
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
What do you mean by "floating"?

If the mass is initially at rest, and the static friction is sufficient to balance the component of the weight acting down the plane, then the mass will remain in place.
 
Doc Al said:
What do you mean by "floating"?

If the mass is initially at rest, and the static friction is sufficient to balance the component of the weight acting down the plane, then the mass will remain in place.

my friend but then it is not expected to remain there
as observed it would start sliding down
but the question that kicks me the most is why does it slide down with CONSTANT SPEED?
point to be noted - even though the gravitaional and frictional force are supposed to be same mathematically in this state ... motion is observed along the gravitational direction ... why?
 
Last edited:
what i simply mean by floating is that the mass in that state will have net zero force acting on it (air friction can be considered nil) so it should either simply remain there or start moving randomly on the plane.
 
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
A mass with zero net force does not "start moving randomly". If its initial speed is zero, it remains zero. If it's moving (in which case it's kinetic friction that matters) then it will remain moving at constant speed.
 
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,736
894
Nirav Chavda said:
what i simply mean by floating is that the mass in that state will have net zero force acting on it (air friction can be considered nil) so it should either simply remain there or start moving randomly on the plane.
No, that's not correct. The object will have a force of gravity straight downward. The "supporting" force (without friction) is perpendicular to the inclined plane. They do not "cancel" and the net force is not zero.
 
mukundpa
Homework Helper
524
3
The gravitational force and the frictional force are not balancing each other. The friction is tangential to the plane, while the gravity is vertical. Friend you have forgotten the normal reaction. Is it?
 
Doc Al said:
A mass with zero net force does not "start moving randomly". If its initial speed is zero, it remains zero. If it's moving (in which case it's kinetic friction that matters) then it will remain moving at constant speed.

but then how will you explain the sliding down of that matter where the initial speed is zero.
 
Last edited:
mukundpa said:
The gravitational force and the frictional force are not balancing each other. The friction is tangential to the plane, while the gravity is vertical. Friend you have forgotten the normal reaction. Is it?
i didn't get you when you said not balanced.
i'm talkin about the gravity acting along the plane.
 
mukundpa
Homework Helper
524
3
that is the component of the weight tangential to the plane, what about the other component normal to the plane?
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, that's not correct. The object will have a force of gravity straight downward. The "supporting" force (without friction) is perpendicular to the inclined plane. They do not "cancel" and the net force is not zero.
you are not getting my point.. i'm speaking of the active gravity ie- gravity acting along the plane (inclined downwards )
at repose angle they ARE equal and thats what repose angle is meant for.
 
mukundpa
Homework Helper
524
3
The normal compnent is pushing the body towards the plane and thus the plane is reacting and appling equal and opposite reaction which is called the normal reaction.
 
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
Nirav Chavda said:
but then how will you explain the sliding down of that matter where the initial speed is zero.
Please try to explain your question once again, clearly. Is there friction along the plane? Is the friction great enough to balance the component of gravity acting down the plane? If yes, then the mass is in equilibrium: it will NOT start moving down the plane.

Of course, if the friction is insufficient, there will be a net force on the mass acting down the plane. It will start moving. Where's the issue?
 
mukundpa said:
that is the component of the weight tangential to the plane, what about the other component normal to the plane?
just forget those normal forces as we just want the mass to float meaning it should move on the plane randomly or remain still.
here normal aren't required as we are stuck with the plane.
 
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
Nirav Chavda said:
just forget those normal forces as we just want the mass to float meaning it should move on the plane randomly or remain still.
here normal aren't required as we are stuck with the plane.
Understanding the role of normal force is crucial in understanding the behavior of the mass. All forces count. (It's the normal force that determines the maximum value of the friction force.)
 
Doc Al said:
Please try to explain your question once again, clearly. Is there friction along the plane? Is the friction great enough to balance the component of gravity acting down the plane? If yes, then the mass is in equilibrium: it will NOT start moving down the plane.

Of course, if the friction is insufficient, there will be a net force on the mass acting down the plane. It will start moving. Where's the issue?
brother ... here is my question again-

a mass is placed on an rough inclined plane which has an angle = inverse tan(coefficient of linear frictional force)
in such case the gravity down the plane (inclined) and the limiting frictional force are balanced.

just tell me what will happen next?
 
mukundpa
Homework Helper
524
3
Thanks, at least you say that we are stuck with the plane, and this is due to the nornal forces.
As far as tangential forces are concerned we say that in the limiting equlibrium the body is at the verge of sliding down. The forces are balanced and hence there is no acceleration.
A slight disterbunce(very little force) may disturb the equilibrium and the friction will change to kinetic friction less then the static one and the body start accelerating, but still normal componene of the weight keep the body pushing towards the plane and the body can not float.
 
Doc Al said:
Understanding the role of normal force is crucial in understanding the behavior of the mass. All forces count. (It's the normal force that determines the maximum value of the friction force.)

i'm telling to neglect noraml force becoz here the mass is remaining constant and so remains the N.F
so N.F doesn't mean much when we talk of motion along the 2D inclined plane as it doen't change at all with time
 
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
Nirav Chavda said:
brother ... here is my question again-

a mass is placed on an rough inclined plane which has an angle = inverse tan(coefficient of linear frictional force)
in such case the gravity down the plane (inclined) and the limiting frictional force are balanced.

just tell me what will happen next?
You are talking about an incline exactly at the angle at which the maximum static friction just balances the component of gravity down the plane. Since the net force is zero, and the mass starts at rest: Nothing will happen. Exceed that angle by just a bit and there will be a net force.

(Lot's of luck being exactly at that angle.)
 
Last edited:
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
Nirav Chavda said:
i'm telling to neglect noraml force becoz here the mass is remaining constant and so remains the N.F
so N.F doesn't mean much when we talk of motion along the 2D inclined plane as it doen't change at all with time
I take it that you've never derived for yourself the formula for determining the angle at which the plane must be to have the mass just start to slide.
 
mukundpa said:
Thanks, at least you say that we are stuck with the plane, and this is due to the nornal forces.
As far as tangential forces are concerned we say that in the limiting equlibrium the body is at the verge of sliding down. The forces are balanced and hence there is no acceleration.
A slight disterbunce(very little force) may disturb the equilibrium and the friction will change to kinetic friction less then the static one and the body start accelerating, but still normal componene of the weight keep the body pushing towards the plane and the body can not float.
great ! you got a point there!
so there is an infinitesimal (or so ) disturbance which changes the static friction to kinetic friction where K.F<S.F

but why has it to move only downwards?
 
Doc Al said:
I take it that you've never derived for yourself the formula for determining the angle at which the plane must be to have the mass just start to slide.
why do you think so?
 
Doc Al
Mentor
44,827
1,083
Nirav Chavda said:
why do you think so?
Because of your statement about the unimportance of the normal force.

Please make whatever point you wanted to make.
 
Doc Al said:
Because of your statement about the unimportance of the normal force.

Please make whatever point you wanted to make.
just tell me how will you use this N.F to prove that the body just can't move in such conditions ... here actually (as observed) the mass would slide down
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Shouldn't it float?

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
867
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top