1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Show [ (A -> B) ^ (B -> C) ] -> (A -> C)

  1. Jan 25, 2017 #1
    Hello,

    I need to show that the following is a tautology using only logical equivalences. I am not allowed to use hypothetical syllogism or other rules of inference.

    [ (A -> B) ^ (B -> C) ] -> (A -> C)

    I've been trying this for hours, and I haven't been able to do this without resorting to a truth table, a truth tree, or rules of inference. Is there actually a way to show that this is a tautology by using the rules below?

    upload_2017-1-25_12-21-3.png

    upload_2017-1-25_12-21-26.png
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Show [ (A -> B) ^ (B -> C) ] -> (A -> C)
  1. Showing Collinearity (Replies: 2)

Loading...