Show equality of probabilities

In summary, the events A and B are disjoint, and the probability measure $P$ satisfies $P(A\cap B)-P(A)P(B)=-P(A^c)P(B)-P(A^c\cap B)$.
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :giggle:

Let $(\Omega, p)$ be a discrete probability room with induced probability measure $P$ and let $A, B\subseteq \Omega$ be two events.
I want to show that $P(A\cap B)-P(A)P(B)=P(A^c)P(B)-P(A^c\cap B)$.

For that do we write to what for example $P(A^c\cap B)$ is equal to simplify the expression or which way is the best one? :unsure:

We have that $(A\cap B)\cap (A^c\cap B)=\emptyset$ and so \begin{align*}&P((A\cap B)\cup (A^c\cap B))=P(A\cap B)+P (A^c\cap B)\\ & \Rightarrow P((A\cup A^c)\cap B)=P(A\cap B)+P (A^c\cap B)\end{align*}
Now we have to show that $P((A\cup A^c)\cap B)=P(A)P(B)+P(A^c)P(B)=[P(A)+P(A^c)]P(B)$, right?
We get that result if $(A\cup A^c)$ and $B$ are independent, or not? How can we show that? :unsure:

Or is there an other (better) way to show the desired expression? :unsure:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey mathmari!

We have that $(A\cup A^c)=\Omega$ and $B\subseteq \Omega$.
So $(A\cup A^c)\cap B=B$. 🤔

Also note that a probability measure must have $P(\Omega)=1$.
And since $A$ and $A^c$ are disjoint, we also have $P(A\cup A^c)=P(A)+P(A^c)$. 🤔
 
  • #3
Klaas van Aarsen said:
We have that $(A\cup A^c)=\Omega$ and $B\subseteq \Omega$.
So $(A\cup A^c)\cap B=B$. 🤔

Also note that a probability measure must have $P(\Omega)=1$.
And since $A$ and $A^c$ are disjoint, we also have $P(A\cup A^c)=P(A)+P(A^c)$. 🤔

So do we have the following ?

\begin{align*}&P((A\cap B)\cup (A^c\cap B))=P(A\cap B)+P (A^c\cap B) \\ & \Rightarrow P((A\cup A^c)\cap B)=P(A\cap B)+P (A^c\cap B)\\ &\Rightarrow P( B)=P(A\cap B)+P (A^c\cap B)\end{align*} and \begin{align*}P(A)P(B)+P(A^c)P(B)&=[P(A)+P(A^c)]P(B)\\ & =[P(A)+1-P(A))]P(B)\\ & =P(B)\end{align*} Combining these results we get \begin{align*}
&P(A\cap B)+P (A^c\cap B)=P(A)P(B)+P(A^c)P(B) \\ & \Rightarrow P(A\cap B)-P(A)P(B)=P(A^c)P(B)-P(A^c\cap B)\end{align*}
Is everything correct? :unsure:
 
  • #4
Yep. All correct. (Nod)
 
  • #5
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yep. All correct. (Nod)

Great! (Sun)

Suppose we have that $P(A)=0.8$ and $P(A\cap B)=0.4$.

I want to check if $P(B)=0.3$ and $P(B)=0.7$ is possible.

For $P(B)=0.3$ : We substitute at the above proven equality and since we get then $P(A^c\cap B)=-0.1$ and since a probability cannot be negativ $P(B)$ cannot be $0.3$.

For $P(B)=0.7$ : Substituting at the above equality we get an acceptable probability. But substituting at $P(A\cup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\cap B)$ we get that $P(A\cup B)=1.1$ and since a probability cannot be greater than $1$ $P(B)$ cannot be $0.7$.

Is everything correct? :unsure:
 
  • #6
Yep. (Nod)p

We can verify by drawing a Venn diagram. (Nerd)
 
Last edited:

1. What is "show equality of probabilities"?

"Show equality of probabilities" refers to the process of demonstrating that two or more events have an equal chance of occurring. It is a way to mathematically prove that there is no bias or preference towards one outcome over another.

2. Why is it important to show equality of probabilities in scientific research?

Showing equality of probabilities is important in scientific research because it ensures that the results are unbiased and accurate. If there is a bias towards one outcome, it can lead to incorrect conclusions and affect the validity of the research.

3. What methods are commonly used to show equality of probabilities?

There are several methods that can be used to show equality of probabilities, including statistical tests such as the chi-square test, t-test, and ANOVA. These tests compare the observed frequencies of events to the expected frequencies and determine if they are significantly different.

4. Can "show equality of probabilities" be applied to all types of data?

Yes, "show equality of probabilities" can be applied to all types of data, including categorical and continuous data. However, the specific methods used may vary depending on the type of data being analyzed.

5. How do scientists interpret the results of a "show equality of probabilities" test?

Scientists interpret the results of a "show equality of probabilities" test by comparing the calculated p-value to a predetermined significance level. If the p-value is less than the significance level, it is considered statistically significant and the null hypothesis of equal probabilities is rejected. If the p-value is greater than the significance level, there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and it is concluded that the events have equal probabilities.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
859
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
919
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
10
Views
811
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top