Proving Linearity of Transformation T on U

In summary, linearity of a transformation T on a vector space U means that for any vectors u and v in U and any scalar k, the properties T(u + v) = T(u) + T(v) and T(ku) = kT(u) must hold. Proving linearity is important for understanding the behavior and properties of the transformation, and it can be done by using the definition of linearity and performing mathematical computations. There are various techniques for proving linearity, such as using algebraic manipulations and geometric arguments. A transformation cannot be partially linear, but it may be affine, which has some similarities to a linear transformation but does not fully satisfy the definition of linearity.
  • #1
nietzsche
186
0

Homework Statement



Suppose U is a finite dimensional vector space and A = {u1, u2, ... , un} is a basis of U. Define T : U -> R(nx1) by T(v) = [v]A.

(In other words: U is an n-dimensional vector space, A is a basis for U, and T is the transformation that takes a vector in U and finds its coordinate vector with respect to the basis A.)

Show that T is a linear transformation. Find kerT.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If v and w are arbitrary vectors in U and a and b are scalars, we have

T(av+bw)
= [av+bw]A
=[av1+bw1, ... , avn+bwn]A
=[av1 + ... + avn]A + [bw1 + ... + bwn]A
=a[v1 + ... + vn]A + b[w1 + ... + wn]A
=aT(v) + bT(w)

So T is a linear transformation.

I just don't see if what I'm doing here is justified. Please help! Thanks.


And for finding kerT, since A is a basis, it is linearly independent, so the only way to get the zero vector is to multiply everything by 0, so kerT = {0}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Your solution for showing that T is a linear transformation is correct. You have correctly shown that T satisfies the two properties of a linear transformation: T(av + bw) = aT(v) + bT(w) and T(0) = 0.

However, your reasoning for finding kerT is not entirely complete. While it is true that the only way to get the zero vector is to multiply everything by 0, you also have to consider the fact that [v]A = 0 only when v = 0. This is because A is a basis, which means that every vector in U can be uniquely represented as a linear combination of the basis vectors. Therefore, if [v]A = 0, it must be the case that v = 0.

So, the kernel of T is actually the set of all vectors v in U such that T(v) = [v]A = 0. Since this only occurs when v = 0, we can say that kerT = {0}.

I hope this helps clarify your understanding of the problem. Keep up the good work!
 

1. How do you define linearity of a transformation on a vector space?

Linearity of a transformation T on a vector space U means that for any vectors u and v in U and any scalar k, the following two properties hold: T(u + v) = T(u) + T(v) and T(ku) = kT(u).

2. What is the significance of proving linearity of a transformation?

Proving linearity of a transformation is important because it allows us to understand the behavior of the transformation and its effect on vectors in the vector space. It also helps us to determine whether the transformation has certain useful properties, such as preserving vector operations and scaling.

3. How do you prove linearity of a transformation T on a vector space U?

To prove linearity of a transformation T on a vector space U, we need to show that the two properties of linearity hold for all vectors u and v in U and for any scalar k. This can be done by using the definition of linearity and performing mathematical computations to show that the properties hold.

4. Are there any specific techniques or methods for proving linearity of a transformation?

Yes, there are several techniques and methods that can be used to prove linearity of a transformation. These include using the definition of linearity, using algebraic manipulations, and using geometric arguments. The specific method used will depend on the specific transformation and vector space being considered.

5. Can a transformation be partially linear?

No, a transformation cannot be partially linear. A transformation is either linear or it is not. If a transformation does not satisfy the two properties of linearity, it cannot be considered linear. However, a transformation may be affine, which means it has some similarities to a linear transformation but does not satisfy the full definition of linearity.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
447
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
605
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
788
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
616
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top