Hello! I am trying to show that the ADM definition of angular momentum is well-defined and finite. Here is the definition:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]J^{i}[/itex] = -[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]lim_{r\rightarrow\infty}[/itex][itex]\int_{S_{r}}[/itex][itex]\epsilon_{ijm}[/itex] [itex]x^{j}[/itex] ([itex]k_{mn}[/itex] - [itex]\overline{g}_{mn}[/itex] [itex]tr k[/itex]) [itex]d[/itex][itex]S_{n}[/itex]

I'm working with an asymptotically flat, complete, Riemannian spacelike hypersurface along with the r-dependence for [itex]\overline{g}_{ij}[/itex] and [itex]k_{ij}[/itex].

Any insight on how I might go about showing that this is well-defined? Finite? Essentially I want to come up with a condition on the r-dependence that guarantees these properties.

Thanks for any help!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Showing ADM angular momentum to be well-defined and finite

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Showing angular momentum | Date |
---|---|

I Left translate back to I in SO(3) | Oct 3, 2017 |

Set of points in S^3, way to show spaced equal or not? | Mar 20, 2015 |

Show that this vector is timelike? | Feb 16, 2015 |

Showing that the Lie derivative of a function is the directional deriv | Aug 22, 2013 |

How to show that a locally diffeomorphic mapping from R to R is open? | Feb 28, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**