Showing Collinearity: Methods & Geometric Shapes

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtl42
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine if three points are collinear, several methods can be employed beyond checking slopes. One effective approach is using the wedge product of vectors formed by the points; if the wedge product of vectors PQ and PR equals zero, the points are collinear. Another method involves calculating the distances between the points; if the sum of the two smaller distances equals the third, the points are also collinear. These geometric methods provide alternative ways to confirm collinearity. Understanding these techniques enhances the analysis of point arrangements in geometry.
dtl42
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
What methods are there to show that three points are, or aren't collinear?

I know the standard, check the slopes stuff, but what other ways are there, I think there are some more obscure methods for geometric shapes right?

Thanks very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
if the points are P, Q and R, you can always wedge (i.e. take the vector product of) the vectors PQ and PR. The points will be colinear if and only if the wedge product is zero (i.e. the PQ and QR are parallel).
 
A straight line is the shortest distance between points. Calculate d(P,Q), d(P,R), d(Q,R), P, Q, and R are collinear if the sum of the two smaller distances is equal to the third distance.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top