Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News Sibel Edmond's Deposition

  1. Aug 29, 2009 #1
    http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7374#more-7374"

    She has been blocked from testifying multiple times by the Bush administration's Dept. of Justice for nearly eight years by the invocation of the State Secretes Privilege. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Secrets_Privilege" [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 29, 2009 #2

    Hepth

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Re: Edmond Sibel's Deposition

    Her name is Sibel Edmonds, not Edmon Sibel...
     
  4. Aug 29, 2009 #3
    Re: Edmond Sibel's Deposition

    Whoops, fixed.
     
  5. Aug 29, 2009 #4
    Re: Edmond Sibel's Deposition

    I'm sure it won't slip past Eric Holder - if it has merit.
     
  6. Aug 29, 2009 #5
    Re: Edmond Sibel's Deposition

    Is there anything in particular within in her deposition which you find disreputable? I'll wager that Holder will let this pass simply because it implicates far too many powerful interests than I'd expect him to be willing to confront.
     
  7. Aug 29, 2009 #6
    Re: Edmond Sibel's Deposition

    Which "interests" are too powerful for Holder to confront?
     
  8. Aug 29, 2009 #7
    I did not intend to suggest any are individually too powerful to confront, but rather that their combined power could likely be perceived by Holder as such.

    Anyway, I'm still curious; as there anything in particular within in Edmond's deposition which you find disreputable?
     
  9. Aug 29, 2009 #8
    Her story is certainly not a secret.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/25/60minutes/main526954.shtml

    Again, as Holder conducts his investigation of the CIA and (hopefully Nancy Pelosi will have an opportunity to testify), who knows where the investigation will lead?

    Some things should be above politics. There should be no wiggle room for politicians in the areas of national defense, health care, or honesty.

    Charlie Rangel being the latest http://www.nypost.com/seven/08282009/news/regionalnews/oops__charlie_forgot_this_1m_house_186849.htm [Broken]

    Holder needs to be consistent in his prosecution of cases - not based on who may be implicated.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Sibel Edmond's Deposition
Loading...