1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sig figs

  1. Sep 14, 2005 #1


    User Avatar

    just to clarify on sig figs...for example if a question asked what is the volume of a box that is 85 m by 92 m by 95 m, the answer is 742900 m^3 but since each number has 2 sig figs, the answer must be reported as 740,000 m^3?

    is that correct?

    also, 150 has 2 sig figs but 150. has 3...right?

  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 14, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You've got it.
    Actually, it's probably better form to write it as:
    [tex]7.4 \times 10^{5}[/tex]
    Since that will leave no doubt about whether the zeros are significant.
  4. Sep 14, 2005 #3


    User Avatar


    regarding the "150 vs 150." - i know how many sig figs it has but can someone explain WHY the decimal at the end makes the 0 significant in 150. compared to only 150?
  5. Sep 14, 2005 #4
    150. is read as 150.0
  6. Sep 14, 2005 #5


    User Avatar

    umm..i dont think so, i think 150.0 has four sig figs, 150. has three, and 150 two.

    dnt, the decimal in 150. is just a way of saying that, to the limits of your measuring tool, for example: this stick is exactly 150. metres , not 149, not 151, but 150.
    and in the case of 150.0, it would be implied that your measuring tool can measure to the tenth of a metre and for example you could say: this stick measures exactly 150.0 meters, not 150.1 not 150.2, but 150.0, though you know nothing about the second decimal place. it could be 150.01, 150.0[1-9], u dont know, its too precise for ur measuring tool. u get it?
  7. Sep 14, 2005 #6


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    It would, of course, be better to write them as 1.5 x 102 if you intend 2 sig figures, 1.50x102 if you intend 3, 1.500x102 if you intend 4.
  8. Sep 14, 2005 #7
    i didnt say it IS 150.0, it is understood as 150 and nothing else. exactly 150, it has 3 significant figures.
  9. Sep 14, 2005 #8


    User Avatar

    sorry, i missunderstood ur statement
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Sig figs
  1. Sig Figs (Replies: 1)

  2. Sig figs (Replies: 2)

  3. Sig Figs (Replies: 1)

  4. Sig figs (Replies: 4)

  5. Sig. Fig. question. (Replies: 8)