- #1

- 238

- 0

is that correct?

also, 150 has 2 sig figs but 150. has 3...right?

thanks.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter dnt
- Start date

- #1

- 238

- 0

is that correct?

also, 150 has 2 sig figs but 150. has 3...right?

thanks.

- #2

NateTG

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 2,450

- 6

dnt said:

is that correct?

also, 150 has 2 sig figs but 150. has 3...right?

thanks.

You've got it.

Actually, it's probably better form to write it as:

[tex]7.4 \times 10^{5}[/tex]

Since that will leave no doubt about whether the zeros are significant.

- #3

- 238

- 0

regarding the "150 vs 150." - i know how many sig figs it has but can someone explain WHY the decimal at the end makes the 0 significant in 150. compared to only 150?

- #4

- 2,210

- 1

150. is read as 150.0

- #5

- 501

- 0

umm..i dont think so, i think 150.0 has four sig figs, 150. has three, and 150 two.whozum said:150. is read as 150.0

dnt, the decimal in 150. is just a way of saying that, to the limits of your measuring tool, for example: this stick is exactly 150. metres , not 149, not 151, but 150.

and in the case of 150.0, it would be implied that your measuring tool can measure to the tenth of a metre and for example you could say: this stick measures exactly 150.0 meters, not 150.1 not 150.2, but 150.0, though you know nothing about the second decimal place. it could be 150.01, 150.0[1-9], u dont know, its too precise for ur measuring tool. u get it?

- #6

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,847

- 967

- #7

- 2,210

- 1

DB said:umm..i dont think so, i think 150.0 has four sig figs, 150. has three, and 150 two.

i didnt say it IS 150.0, it is understood as 150 and nothing else. exactly 150, it has 3 significant figures.

- #8

- 501

- 0

sorry, i missunderstood ur statement

Share: