I am trying to better my understanding of [itex]\sigma[/itex]-[itex]algebra[/itex]s, and I have a bit of an issue with one of the examples. This is from Cohn Measure Theory, and before I give the problem, here are two definitions:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let [itex]X[/itex] be an arbitrary set. A collection [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] of subsets of [itex]X[/itex] is an [itex]algebra[/itex] on [itex]X[/itex] if:

(a) [itex]X \in Z[/itex]

(b) for each set [itex]A[/itex] that belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex], the set [itex]A^c[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex]

(c) for each finite sequence [itex]A_{1}, ... , A_{n}[/itex] of sets that belong to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] the set [itex]\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}A_{i}[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] and

(d) for each finite sequence [itex]A_{1}, ... , A_{n}[/itex] of sets that belong to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] the set [itex]\bigcap_{i=1}^{n}A_{i}[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex]

Let [itex]X[/itex] be an arbitrary set. A collection [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] of subsets of [itex]X[/itex] is a [itex]\sigma[/itex]-[itex]algebra[/itex] on [itex]X[/itex] if:

(a) [itex]X \in Z[/itex]

(b) for each set [itex]A[/itex] that belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex], the set [itex]A^c[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex]

(c) for each infinite sequence [itex]\{A_{i}\}[/itex] of sets that belong to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] the set [itex]\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] and

(d) for each infinite sequence [itex]\{A_{1}\}[/itex] of sets that belong to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex] the set [itex]\bigcap_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i}[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta\Large[/itex]

Okay, with all that. Here is what I am having issues with.

If [itex]X[/itex] is an infinite set, and [itex]\delta[/itex] is the collection of all subsets [itex]A[/itex] such that either [itex]A[/itex] or [itex]A^c[/itex] is finite. Then [itex]\delta[/itex] is an algebra on [itex]X[/itex] but not closed under the formation of countable unions, and so not a [itex]\sigma[/itex]-[itex]algebra[/itex].

So, if I take, for example [itex]X[/itex] to be the set of all positive integers, that is [itex]X = {1,2,3,...}[/itex] and define [itex] A_{i} = i [/itex].

Then, I have [itex]\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}A_{i} = {1,2,3,...,n}[/itex] which belongs to [itex]\delta[/itex] but [itex]\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}A_{i} = {1,2,3,...}[/itex] belongs to [itex]\delta[/itex] as well, so why does this fail to be a [itex]\sigma[/itex]-[itex]algebra[/itex]? Where have I gone wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sigma Algebra on infinite set

Loading...

Similar Threads for Sigma Algebra infinite | Date |
---|---|

Increasing sequence of sigma algebras | Oct 30, 2015 |

Sigma Algebra on Omega (Sample Space) | Oct 22, 2013 |

Uncountable additivity (sigma algebra) | Oct 21, 2013 |

Infinite sigma-algebra | Apr 21, 2005 |

Countably infinite sigma-algebra | Feb 24, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**