- #1

Demiwing

- 16

- 0

1200 X 23.4

What is that in significant figures?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Demiwing
- Start date

- #1

Demiwing

- 16

- 0

1200 X 23.4

What is that in significant figures?

- #2

bomba923

- 760

- 0

Remember that products will have as many sigfigs as the least accurate multiplier.

Here, in your case, 1200 [itex] \Rightarrow [/itex] 2 sigfigs, and 23.4 [itex] \Rightarrow [/itex] 3 sigfigs.

*Therefore, the product will have two sigfigs, represented as [itex] 28000 = 2.8 \cdot 10^4 [/itex]

->Just remember the sigfigs product rule here

- #3

erok81

- 464

- 0

-All digits except zeros at the beginning of the number are significant.

i.e 9.12 (3) 0.912 (3) 0.00000912 (3)

-Terminal zeros @ right of decimal point are significant.

i.e 912.0 has four.

Multiplication and division;

Final answer has the same amount of significant figures as the number with the least sig fig in original problem.

i.e 34.987 x 54.2 = 1896.3

Addition and subtraction;

Final answer has the same number of sig fig as the number with the least number of decimal places.

i.e 12.9875 + 1.23 = 14.22

I think the best way to explain it is, you answer can only be as accurate as the least accurate answer. If that makes sense.

If you still don't get it, I have another way to explain but it's as long, if not longer than this. I don't really want to type that out yet. Haha.

Hope this helps.

- #4

bomba923

- 760

- 0

erok81 said:I always hated those when I was first learning them. Here are the basic rules.

Hmm, I always liked sigfigs, never hated learning them..

Last edited:

- #5

GCT

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 1,742

- 0

first term has two sig figs, the second has three, your final product should have two sig figs.

- #6

erok81

- 464

- 0

bomba923 said:Hmm, I always liked sigfigs, never hated learning them..

Ok, not really hated. But they are easy to get confused on. So as I was learning them I can't say I liked them. :tongue2:

But after the first few minutes I liked them. Most of the class was still having problems with them by the end though.

- #7

amcavoy

- 665

- 0

The concept is very simple, but it is surprisingly easy to make a mistake when working with sigfigs.

- #8

bomba923

- 760

- 0

*Mostly I just double-check my work to ensure proper use of sigfigsapmcavoy said:The concept is very simple, but it is surprisingly easy to make a mistake when working with sigfigs.

However, the stupid mistakes I do make :shy:, are just silly arithmetic errors (working under duress!), usually (+) sometimes (-). Though when working under pressure/duress...double-checking isn't always convenient

Share:

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 566

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K