# Significant Figures concept

1. Sep 1, 2005

### Demiwing

I don't really get the concept of significant figures. Anyone can help me out?
1200 X 23.4
What is that in significant figures?

2. Sep 2, 2005

### bomba923

*Significant figures = "sigfigs"
Remember that products will have as many sigfigs as the least accurate multiplier.
Here, in your case, 1200 $\Rightarrow$ 2 sigfigs, and 23.4 $\Rightarrow$ 3 sigfigs.

*Therefore, the product will have two sigfigs, represented as $28000 = 2.8 \cdot 10^4$

->Just remember the sigfigs product rule here

3. Sep 2, 2005

### erok81

I always hated those when I was first learning them. Here are the basic rules.

-All digits except zeros at the beginning of the number are significant.
i.e 9.12 (3) 0.912 (3) 0.00000912 (3)

-Terminal zeros @ right of decimal point are significant.
i.e 912.0 has four.

Multiplication and division;

Final answer has the same amount of significant figures as the number with the least sig fig in original problem.

i.e 34.987 x 54.2 = 1896.3

Final answer has the same number of sig fig as the number with the least number of decimal places.
i.e 12.9875 + 1.23 = 14.22

I think the best way to explain it is, you answer can only be as accurate as the least accurate answer. If that makes sense.

If you still don't get it, I have another way to explain but it's as long, if not longer than this. I don't really want to type that out yet. Haha.

Hope this helps.

4. Sep 2, 2005

### bomba923

Hmm, I always liked sigfigs, never hated learning them..

Last edited: Sep 2, 2005
5. Sep 2, 2005

### GCT

first term has two sig figs, the second has three, your final product should have two sig figs.

6. Sep 2, 2005

### erok81

Ok, not really hated. But they are easy to get confused on. So as I was learning them I can't say I liked them. :tongue2:

But after the first few minutes I liked them. Most of the class was still having problems with them by the end though.

7. Sep 6, 2005

### amcavoy

The concept is very simple, but it is surprisingly easy to make a mistake when working with sigfigs.

8. Sep 6, 2005

### bomba923

*Mostly I just double-check my work to ensure proper use of sigfigs
However, the stupid mistakes I do make :shy:, are just silly arithmetic errors (working under duress!), usually (+) sometimes (-). Though when working under pressure/duress...double-checking isn't always convenient