- #1
- 19
- 0
Silent Healing
http://www.wds-global.co.uk/products/silenthealing.aspx [Broken]
Here is an incredible hoax to debunk. I will need a little help with the maths, just. See below.
Background, see the link. This expensive audio CD contains - yes, 74 minutes silence! :-)
Even in four different, named tracks with durations:
1. Preparation 4.01
2. The Clearing 4.05
3. The Attunement 3.52
4. The Full Session 61.16
The website promises:
"Our research has shown that selected bio-resonance patterns are beneficial in restoring the balance of the subtle energy systems within the body’s bio-field. Our engineers have encapsulated these patterns onto the Silent Healing® audio CD. The CD releases the bio-resonance patterns into the body's bio-field when it is played back through the amplifier and speakers. The effective range of Silent Healing® depends on the power of the amplifier and speakers. (A small CD player would be sufficient for a large size room)."
I bought the CD and ventured an acoustical analysis:
First I played the audio CD in the PC and recorded some of it with PolderbitS Sound Recorder (http://www.polderbits.com/), that claims to catch everything that goes out through the speakers.
Next, I used the sound editor program Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/) to amplify a representative 34 seconds of the recording by 50 dB (!) three times over.
Finally, I analysed the resulting sound with Praat (http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/), a powerful software for phonetical analysis. It would give me the oscillogram, spectrogram, pitch curve, and intensity curve.
Result: Nil. A straight line. Not even a background noise. In a 9 second segment, the intensity read-outs were: -300 dB (maximum intensity in SELECTION)
-300.00000000000006 dB (mean-energy intensity in SELECTION)
-300 dB (minimum intensity in SELECTION)
If there is a way of posting images, tell me and I shall post the "curves".
Here is my arithmetic problem. It's too easy (for me) to get dB calculations wrong:
Considering that an increase by roughly 3 dB is a doubling of intensity, and I amplified the original sound in Audacity by 50 dB, then the result again by 50, and that again a third time by 50 dB, does that mean that I amplified the sound by 50 * 50 * 50 = 125,000 dB, and that divided by 3 makes more than 41,000 doublings?
Or is it rather 50/3 + 50/3 + 50/3 = 50 doublings?
Or something in between, i.e., 50/3 * 50/3 * 50/3 = about 4,600 doublings?
How many "times" amplification is 50 "doublings"?
Anyhow whatever, there is nothing physical in this CD except the plastic.
Cheers,
Olle
http://www.wds-global.co.uk/products/silenthealing.aspx [Broken]
Here is an incredible hoax to debunk. I will need a little help with the maths, just. See below.
Background, see the link. This expensive audio CD contains - yes, 74 minutes silence! :-)
Even in four different, named tracks with durations:
1. Preparation 4.01
2. The Clearing 4.05
3. The Attunement 3.52
4. The Full Session 61.16
The website promises:
"Our research has shown that selected bio-resonance patterns are beneficial in restoring the balance of the subtle energy systems within the body’s bio-field. Our engineers have encapsulated these patterns onto the Silent Healing® audio CD. The CD releases the bio-resonance patterns into the body's bio-field when it is played back through the amplifier and speakers. The effective range of Silent Healing® depends on the power of the amplifier and speakers. (A small CD player would be sufficient for a large size room)."
I bought the CD and ventured an acoustical analysis:
First I played the audio CD in the PC and recorded some of it with PolderbitS Sound Recorder (http://www.polderbits.com/), that claims to catch everything that goes out through the speakers.
Next, I used the sound editor program Audacity (http://audacity.sourceforge.net/) to amplify a representative 34 seconds of the recording by 50 dB (!) three times over.
Finally, I analysed the resulting sound with Praat (http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/), a powerful software for phonetical analysis. It would give me the oscillogram, spectrogram, pitch curve, and intensity curve.
Result: Nil. A straight line. Not even a background noise. In a 9 second segment, the intensity read-outs were: -300 dB (maximum intensity in SELECTION)
-300.00000000000006 dB (mean-energy intensity in SELECTION)
-300 dB (minimum intensity in SELECTION)
If there is a way of posting images, tell me and I shall post the "curves".
Here is my arithmetic problem. It's too easy (for me) to get dB calculations wrong:
Considering that an increase by roughly 3 dB is a doubling of intensity, and I amplified the original sound in Audacity by 50 dB, then the result again by 50, and that again a third time by 50 dB, does that mean that I amplified the sound by 50 * 50 * 50 = 125,000 dB, and that divided by 3 makes more than 41,000 doublings?
Or is it rather 50/3 + 50/3 + 50/3 = 50 doublings?
Or something in between, i.e., 50/3 * 50/3 * 50/3 = about 4,600 doublings?
How many "times" amplification is 50 "doublings"?
Anyhow whatever, there is nothing physical in this CD except the plastic.
Cheers,
Olle
Last edited by a moderator: