Easy Aerodynamic Formulas for Aircraft Lifting and Air Displacement

  • Thread starter tuoni
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Formulas
In summary, aerodynamics are a topic of interest to you and you are looking for a generic formula for calculating the lifting force (N) required for aircrafts that use aerofoils, and another for calculating the amount of air that needs to be displaced (m^3/s) for aircrafts that in one way or another make use of hovering, by displacing air downwards. The lifting force is related to the integral of mass times acceleration for all the air molecules "affected" by an aircraft. The problem here is setting a practical limit on how much air is "affected". Do you want to include air that is only slightly disturbed, such as accelerated less than 1 nanometer / sec^2? The smaller the amount
  • #1
tuoni
61
0
Hi, I'm working on some simple aerodynamics for a game. Are there any generic, but fairly accurate, formulas for calculating the lifting force (N) required for aircrafts that use aerofoils, and another for calculating the amount of air that needs to be displaced (m^3/s) for aircrafts that in one way or another make use of hovering, by displacing air downwards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The lifting force is related to the integral of mass times acceleration for all the air molecules "affected" by an aircraft. The problem here is setting a practical limit on how much air is "affected". Do you want to include air that is only slightly disturbed, such as accelerated less than 1 nanometer / sec^2? The smaller the amount of disturbance included, the larger the amount of air involved.

For a normal aircraft with normal airfoils, diagrams for "affected" air generally form a half ellipse above the wing, and some smaller shape below, and this area times the forward speed of the aircraft could be used to calculate the volume of air affected per unit time by an aircraft.
 
  • #3
Jeff Reid said:
The lifting force is related to the integral of mass times acceleration for all the air molecules "affected" by an aircraft. The problem here is setting a practical limit on how much air is "affected". Do you want to include air that is only slightly disturbed, such as accelerated less than 1 nanometer / sec^2? The smaller the amount of disturbance included, the larger the amount of air involved.

For a normal aircraft with normal airfoils, diagrams for "affected" air generally form a half ellipse above the wing, and some smaller shape below, and this area times the forward speed of the aircraft could be used to calculate the volume of air affected per unit time by an aircraft.

It is not meant to be completely realistic, so 1 nm/s^2 might be a little overkill. The generic formula seems very practical though, I like that. To simulate different air I could then also simply include a coefficient, with 1.0 being STP (Standard Temperature and Pressure). I take it that the equivalent displacement of air for a hovercraft would be the same as for an aircraft with aerofoils?

E.g. we have two aircrafts, one with aerofoils and the other with engines that directly displace air. If the actual weight of the two aircrafts is the same, the required lift from the aerofoil area would equate to the amount of required displaced air for the aircraft based on the "hovering" technique.

There are ofcourse a few other things I need to think of, e.g. the differential velocity of the aerofoil affects lifting force, while simple displacement does not.

EDIT: Also, would it be proper to say that the amount of required lifting force, or displacement of air, is approximately equal to mass times gravitational force (F=mg)? and if the aircraft is moving I need to consider it's velocity, as traveling fast enough will decrease the amount of required lifting force due to the Earth's spherical form?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Sounds like a game environment to me...

To the EDIT part.
F=ma, if you are considering the Earth a sphere are you planing on really high velocities and heights? If so, recall that the higher the altitude, the less "air" to go over the wing. Air pressure halves roughly every 18,000 feet above sea level for example. So flying or hovering at stratosphere heights requires much bigger "foils". And gravity drops off too, (that pesky inverse square law again...sigh) but not noticably unless you are looking at hight orbit heights. (say the max of 100,000 or so? The highest height a man has ever parachuted from)

What are the boundaries you want to use for flight, or do you want some rough formulas given the limits you can give us?
 

1. What is the definition of aerodynamics?

Aerodynamics is the study of how air moves around objects and affects their movement through the air.

2. What is the purpose of simple aerodynamic formulas?

The purpose of simple aerodynamic formulas is to provide a basic understanding of the principles of aerodynamics and how they can be applied to real-world situations.

3. How are simple aerodynamic formulas different from complex ones?

Simple aerodynamic formulas are typically based on simplified assumptions and may not account for all factors that can affect aerodynamic performance. Complex formulas take into account more variables and provide more accurate results, but may require more advanced mathematical knowledge to use.

4. What are some common examples of simple aerodynamic formulas?

Some common examples of simple aerodynamic formulas include the lift equation, drag equation, and Bernoulli's principle.

5. How can simple aerodynamic formulas be used in real-world applications?

Simple aerodynamic formulas can be used in various real-world applications, such as designing aircraft, cars, and sports equipment. They can also be used in weather forecasting and wind energy production.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
940
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
720
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
121
  • Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
821
Back
Top