Evaluating 12 C 2: How to Simplify Without a Calculator

  • Thread starter qwexor
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Factorial
In summary, the conversation discusses the evaluation of 12 C 2 without a calculator and how it can be simplified to 66. The question of why nCr always yields a positive integer is also raised and explained using the identity (n+1)Cr = nCr-1 + nCr and the combinatorial definition of nCr. It is concluded that all nCr are integers.
  • #1
qwexor
7
0
Ok just a basic question. We are given 12 C 2 to evaluate. Which equals

12! / (10!2!)

Is there an easier way to simplify it. We are asked to do it without a calculator.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Compute it. Write it all out. Lots of stuff to cancel out.

You'll end up with 12*11/2 = 6*11 = 66
 
  • #3
Cancel everything you can with the larger factorial in the denominator.

12!/10!= 12*11 so 12!/(10!)(2!)= 12*11/2= 6*11= 66.
 
  • #4
This is something of an elementary question, but why is it always true that nCr where n>r would always yield a positive integer?
 
  • #5
That's a good question. The identity (n+1)Cr=nCr+nC(r-1), valid if n>=1 and 1<=r<=n, is easy enough to prove using nCr=n!/((n-r)! r!). Also, nC0=nCn=1 for all n>=0. These facts embody the construction of Pascal's triangle and let you prove by induction (on n) that nCr is always an integer since it's either 1 or it's the sum of two integers.

You can also think of the combinatorial definition of nCr, the number of r-subsets of an n-set. This is definitely an integer. Of course then you'd have to prove that the factorial expression for nCr is correct...
 
  • #6
Ethereal said:
This is something of an elementary question, but why is it always true that nCr where n>r would always yield a positive integer?

The nCr are binomial coefficients with the property that n+1Cr = nCr-1 + nCr (think of Pascal's Triangle) with nCn = 1 = nC0. Since 0C0 = 1 it follows that all nCr are integers.
 
  • #7
Shmoe beat me to it! :-)
 

1. What is the process for evaluating 12 C 2 without a calculator?

The process for evaluating 12 C 2 without a calculator involves simplifying the expression using the formula for combinations, which is nCr = n! / r!(n-r)!. In this case, n = 12 and r = 2. So the simplified expression would be 12! / 2!(12-2)! = (12 * 11 * 10!) / (2 * 1 * 10!) = 66.

2. Can you explain the formula for combinations in more detail?

The formula for combinations, nCr = n! / r!(n-r)!, represents the number of ways to choose r objects from a set of n objects. The exclamation point (!) represents the factorial function, which means multiplying a number by all the numbers that come before it. So, for example, 5! would be 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 120. Plugging these values into the formula will give you the total number of combinations for a given set of objects.

3. Why is it important to know how to evaluate 12 C 2 without a calculator?

Knowing how to evaluate 12 C 2 without a calculator is important because it allows you to quickly and accurately calculate combinations in situations where a calculator may not be available or practical. This can be helpful in various fields such as mathematics, statistics, and science, where combinations are often used in problem-solving and data analysis.

4. Are there any other methods for simplifying 12 C 2 without a calculator?

Yes, there are other methods for simplifying 12 C 2 without a calculator, such as using the Pascal's triangle or the binomial theorem. However, the formula for combinations is the most efficient and straightforward method for calculating combinations without a calculator.

5. Can you use this method for evaluating other combinations?

Yes, you can use this method for evaluating other combinations. Simply plug in the values for n and r into the formula nCr = n! / r!(n-r)!. Just remember to use the factorial function for both n and r, and to subtract (n-r) from n when calculating the denominator.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
842
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
724
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
426
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
879
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
894
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
705
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
960
Back
Top