1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Simple Harmonic Motion

  1. Dec 27, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    The masses in figure slide on a frictionless table.m1 ,but not m2 ,is fastened to the spring.If now m1 and m2 are pushed to the left,so that the spring is compressed a distance d,what will be the amplitude of the oscillation of m1 after the spring system is released ?


    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution


    I feel if I can find the position and velocity where m1 loses contact with m2 ,i.e N=0 ,then new amplitude of oscillation can be obtained .

    Let the origin be at m1 when the spring is unstretched.

    The equation of motion for mass m1 is -kx-N = m1d2x/dt2 ,where N is the Normal contact force between the blocks and x is the displacement of the block.

    I would be grateful if someone could help me with the problem.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Dec 27, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 27, 2013 #2
    When a mass is oscillating on a spring, in some positions the spring is pushing, and in some it is pulling. Obviously, as soon as the spring starts pulling, the masses must separate.
     
  4. Dec 27, 2013 #3
    Does that mean the blocks separate when the spring acquires its natural length ?
     
  5. Dec 27, 2013 #4
    You explain what that means :)
     
  6. Dec 27, 2013 #5
    How can i get the result ( i.e when the blocks separate ) mathematically ?

    -kx-N = m1d2x/dt2

    -kx-N = m1vdv/dx

    Integrating,I get m1v2/2 = (k/2)(x+d)(d-x-N)

    Should I put N=0 here ?
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2013
  7. Dec 27, 2013 #6
    I do not think you need to derive anything mathematically here, because the answer is obvious.

    If you must, first consider the motion of the center of mass of the blocks. It is affected only by the external spring force.

    Then, once you know this motion (and you also know that before separation the blocks are in contact), you can have equations for each block, which will have their interreaction force. It should be zero at the separation point, and with that you can locate the separation point.
     
  8. Dec 27, 2013 #7
    EOM of CM : -kx=(m1+m2)d2x/dt2

    EOM of m1 : -kx-N = m1d2x/dt2

    EOM of m2 : N = m2d2x/dt2


    Are these equations correct ? If yes , what should I do next ?
     
  9. Dec 27, 2013 #8
    Before and just at the separation, x is the same in all three equations. At separation, N = 0. Solve for x.
     
  10. Dec 27, 2013 #9
    Could you please give your response to post#5 .
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2013
  11. Dec 27, 2013 #10
    #5 is wrong. N is not constant, so you cannot integrate like that.

    But from the equations in #7, you can find N as a function of x if you want to.
     
  12. Dec 27, 2013 #11
    Right...Thanks !!!

    Okay...so using EOM for m1 and m2 ,N=-kxm2/(m1+m2)

    Now putting N=0 → x=0

    Is this correct ?
     
  13. Dec 27, 2013 #12
    To begin with, both masses will be moving together. At what point in time will the contact force be equal to zero. After that, m1 will slow down faster than if they had been stuck together, while m2 will continue with its existing velocity. How does the motion of m1 vary after that time?
     
  14. Dec 27, 2013 #13
    Yes, x = 0 is correct.
     
  15. Dec 27, 2013 #14
    Hi Chet :smile:

    How should I find the time at which the contact force goes to zero ? Which equation should I use ?
     
  16. Dec 27, 2013 #15
    What is the significance of considering the motion of CM ?
     
  17. Dec 27, 2013 #16
    The contact force goes to zero the first time that d2x/dt2 goes to zero. After that, m1 and m2 separate.
     
  18. Dec 27, 2013 #17
    So,i need to solve m2d2x/dt2 = 0 .

    Right ?
     
  19. Dec 27, 2013 #18
    I think you obtained the equation for the inter-block force from considering the CM motion and the motion of one block. That should answer your question.
     
  20. Dec 27, 2013 #19
    No...

    I considered EOM of m1 and m2 .Knowledge of CM motion was not required .
     
  21. Dec 27, 2013 #20
    Ah, OK. The equation for CM is not strictly required, but I was not sure how you were going to solve the problem. It seemed to me that you wanted to obtain an explicit solution for x, which is very simple if you consider the CM.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Simple Harmonic Motion
Loading...