Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Simple Inequality?

  1. Jun 9, 2005 #1


    User Avatar

    Let [itex]x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{n}[/itex] be real and positive. Show that
    [tex] g\equiv \sqrt[n]{x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}} < \frac{x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots+x_{n}}{n} \equiv a [/tex]
    except when [itex]x_{1}=x_{2}=\ldots = x_{n}[/itex] in which case [itex]a=g[/itex].

    We are given the results (from previous exercises) that
    [tex] \forall x>0 : x+\frac{1}{x} \geq 2 [/tex]
    and if [itex]x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}=1[/itex], then
    [tex] x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots+x_{n}\geq n [/tex]
    and this is equality if and only if [itex]x_{1}=x_{2}=\ldots=x_{n}=1[/itex].

    Clearly if [itex]x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}=1[/itex], then the last result applies directly, and[itex]a>1 = g[/itex]. When [itex]x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}\neq 1[/itex] things are more difficult.

    I can show that, for [itex]x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}<1[/itex], [itex]a>g^{n}=x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}[/itex], but [itex]g>g^{n}[/itex] which doesn't help. To do that I used the first `given' result to derive that
    [tex] x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots + x_{n} \geq 2n - \frac{x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots + x_{n}}{x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}} [/tex]
    and took it from there.

    I'm also not making much progress with the case [itex]x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}>1[/itex]. I have tried doing things like `forcing' the expressions to equal unity by introducing [itex]x_{1}^{-1}[/itex] etc and increasing [itex]n[/itex] accordingly but the problem is then to show that [itex]a[/itex] is greater than the new mean including these reciprocals and that the geometric mean is less than this.

    Any ideas would be apprectiated. (It's probably something very simple which I'm overlooking.)

    The problems are from Shilov "Introductory Real and Complex Analysis", p24 if anyone has that.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 9, 2005 #2

    Set [itex]P=x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}[/itex] then
    [tex] g\equiv \sqrt[n]{x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}} =\sqrt[n]{P} [/tex]

    For the real numbers [itex]w_{i}=x_{i}/g[/itex] we have

    [itex]w_{1}w_{2}\ldots w_{n}=(x_{1}/g)(x_{2}/g)\ldots (x_{n}/g)=P/g^n=1[/itex]

    So, (1) holds for wi. Then

    [tex] w_{1}+w_{2}+\ldots+w_{n}\geq n [/tex] (this is an equality if and only if [tex]w_{i}=1 <=> x_{i}=g [/tex])

    [tex] \frac{x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots+x_{n}}{g}\geq n [/tex]

    [tex] \frac{x_{1}+x_{2}+\ldots+x_{n}}{n}\geq g [/tex]

    That is,
    [tex]a\geq g[/tex] and this is an equality if and only if [tex]x_{i}=g=\sqrt[n]{P}, \forall i [/tex]
  4. Jun 11, 2005 #3


    User Avatar

    Thanks. That seems to solve the problem of making it work for [itex]x_{1}x_{2}\ldots x_{n}\neq 1[/itex]
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Simple Inequality?
  1. An inequality (Replies: 3)

  2. Simple inequality? (Replies: 5)

  3. An inequality (Replies: 4)