Simple Lie algebra question

  • Thread starter vega12
  • Start date
  • #1
11
0
I am currently trying to up my understanding of Lie algebras as the brief introductions I have had from various QFT textbooks feels insufficient, but have been stuck on one small point for a couple days now. I am reading through the lecture notes / book by Robert Cahn found here: http://theory.uchicago.edu/~sethi/Teaching/P385-W2011/texall.pdf. On page 97, I am having trouble understanding how equation XI.31 comes about. I think I get how [itex]Tr C = N_\Lambda \langle \Lambda, \Lambda + 2 \delta \rangle_2 [/itex] comes about, but don't see how I can use the statement regarding (( , )) yielding [itex]l_\phi ( , )_2[/itex] and how that directly leads to XI.31.

A bit of guidance here would be very much appreciated. Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
11
0
I am very sorry for bumping my own thread with a double post. If it turns out that I cannot get a response here, could someone perhaps recommend a more appropriate subforum for me to post in? Would "general math" be more promising? Thanks.
 
  • #3
chiro
Science Advisor
4,797
132
Hey vega12 and welcome to the forums.

With the normalization procedure, what is the definition of something with unit length in the context of the operator you are working with (the matrix)?
 

Related Threads on Simple Lie algebra question

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
602
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
710
  • Last Post
2
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Top