Simple True/False Question

  • Thread starter sundrops
  • Start date
  • #1
55
0
The maximum height reached by a projectile depends on the horizontal velocity component.

True or False


Here's my reasoning - the maximum height is reached when y=0, so in that case the maximum height depends on the horizontal velocity component. I'd like to hear your guys thoughts on this. I only get 1 shot at getting this right so I wanna hear what you guys think! :wink:
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
55
0
is it because of gravity?
 
  • #4
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,070
637
Since it's the only force acting on the projectile (neglecting Magnus effect,aerodynamic force,Stokes force,Coriolis force) i'd say yes...

Daniel.
 
  • #5
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,192
38
Yeah....the KEY point of projectile motion as modelled in school is that horizontal and vertical components of the projectile's velocity are independent. That's what they want you to remember.
 
  • #6
55
0
alright thx guys
 
  • #7
Tide
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,076
0
dextercioby said:
Since it's the only force acting on the projectile (neglecting Magnus effect,aerodynamic force,Stokes force,Coriolis force) i'd say yes...

Daniel.

You left out the finite size of the planet which brings the inverse square law into play! :-)
 
  • #8
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,070
637
He asked me about gravity,not the inverse square law and where it comes from...And besides,everything reduces to solving Einstein's equations,right...?? :wink:

Daniel.
 
  • #9
3,763
9
Tide said:
You left out the finite size of the planet which brings the inverse square law into play! :-)


and to continue dexter's nitpicking, he also forgot to incorporate the fact that the earth is not a perfect sphere...Where are them Legendre-terms in the potential ???


marlon
 
  • #10
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,070
637
"The maximum height reached by a projectile depends on the horizontal velocity component."

Do you see any Earth nonspherical,here???

Daniel.
 
  • #11
3,763
9
do you see any coriolis,blablabla here ???

gravity also changes when you take into account a non-spherical earth

marlon
 
  • #12
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,070
637
The PLANET/celestial body (with atmosphere) A PRIORI SPHERICAL IS ASSUMED ROTATING...

I AGREE with the second part...

Daniel.
 

Related Threads on Simple True/False Question

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
22K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
10K
Top