I Simulation hypothesis

  • Thread starter John2000
  • Start date
4
2
If the simulation hypothesis is really correct, then how will the touch occur (the person touches the other person)? How will the whole process go? In modern physics, it is simply the interaction of atoms.
 
4
2
in simulation theory, will the touch be similar to a collision in computer games?
... it's not science.
 

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
23,240
5,583
Science is not defined by "it's what Elon Musk said".
 
703
148
I think the arguments are that it isn't possible to tell if it's a simulations, they are not arguments for a simulation.

Cheers
 

PeroK

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
10,003
3,777
I think the arguments are that it isn't possible to tell if it's a simulations, they are not arguments for a simulation.

Cheers
That said, if we're running on Windows, you'd imagine we would have experienced a reboot before now!
 

DaveC426913

Gold Member
18,264
1,868
in simulation theory, will the touch be similar to a collision in computer games?
You need to think bigger. Or smaller, as it were.

In such a simulation, the very atoms would be simulated - including the atoms of air between you and the person you have not touched yet. Touching another person is the same kind of collision event as simply being in an atmosphere. You're experiencing countless trillions of collision events every microsecond.

Does that make it more clear how haptic (touch) sense would be simulated?
 
14
5
but Neil Tyson also argued that our universe could be a simulation.
You are engaging in an appeal to a perceived authority here. Both Tyson and especially Musk are known for hyperbolic speculation, however neither of these guys have had any insight into the Simulation Hypothesis. They are just copypasting the work of Nick Boström from 2002. The Simulation Hypothesis is stoner speculation. Sure, we've not yet discovered anything in the universe that is not computable, therefore one can extrapolate that one could maybe simulate a realistic physical universe. This however makes several assumptions: 1) That there'd be a motive for an EXTREMELY advanced Civilization to do such a thing 2) That it's physically possible and 3) That you are in one. It's lazy logic.
 

DaveC426913

Gold Member
18,264
1,868
Sure, we've not yet discovered anything in the universe that is not computable, therefore one can extrapolate that one could maybe simulate a realistic physical universe. This however makes several assumptions: 1) That there'd be a motive for an EXTREMELY advanced Civilization to do such a thing 2) That it's physically possible and 3) That you are in one. It's lazy logic.
Indeed. It is no more or less plausible than "God made the universe and keeps it ticking".
 
1,347
2,604
That said, if we're running on Windows, you'd imagine we would have experienced a reboot before now!
Good call!
And things in our world are getting more superficial and more expensive all the time.
Which hints at we're running on an Apple computer. :smile:
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Simulation hypothesis" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Simulation hypothesis

Replies
6
Views
616
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
703
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • Posted
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
798

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top