Simulation hypothesis

  • I
  • Thread starter John2000
  • Start date
  • #1
4
2
If the simulation hypothesis is really correct, then how will the touch occur (the person touches the other person)? How will the whole process go? In modern physics, it is simply the interaction of atoms.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
15,027
7,204
If the simulation hypothesis is really correct, then ...
... it's not science.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #3
4
2
in simulation theory, will the touch be similar to a collision in computer games?
... it's not science.
 
  • #4
4
2
in simulation theory, will the touch be similar to a collision in computer games?
Elon Musk said the universe is simulation. It's true?
 
  • Haha
Likes MathematicalPhysicist
  • #5
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
25,646
8,838
Science is not defined by "it's what Elon Musk said".
 
  • Like
Likes DEvens
  • #6
4
2
Science is not defined by "it's what Elon Musk said".
but Neil Tyson also argued that our universe could be a simulation.
 
  • Haha
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy and MathematicalPhysicist
  • #7
727
168
I think the arguments are that it isn't possible to tell if it's a simulations, they are not arguments for a simulation.

Cheers
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #8
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
15,027
7,204
I think the arguments are that it isn't possible to tell if it's a simulations, they are not arguments for a simulation.

Cheers
That said, if we're running on Windows, you'd imagine we would have experienced a reboot before now!
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN
  • #9
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,970
2,459
in simulation theory, will the touch be similar to a collision in computer games?
You need to think bigger. Or smaller, as it were.

In such a simulation, the very atoms would be simulated - including the atoms of air between you and the person you have not touched yet. Touching another person is the same kind of collision event as simply being in an atmosphere. You're experiencing countless trillions of collision events every microsecond.

Does that make it more clear how haptic (touch) sense would be simulated?
 
  • #10
40
12
but Neil Tyson also argued that our universe could be a simulation.
You are engaging in an appeal to a perceived authority here. Both Tyson and especially Musk are known for hyperbolic speculation, however neither of these guys have had any insight into the Simulation Hypothesis. They are just copypasting the work of Nick Boström from 2002. The Simulation Hypothesis is stoner speculation. Sure, we've not yet discovered anything in the universe that is not computable, therefore one can extrapolate that one could maybe simulate a realistic physical universe. This however makes several assumptions: 1) That there'd be a motive for an EXTREMELY advanced Civilization to do such a thing 2) That it's physically possible and 3) That you are in one. It's lazy logic.
 
  • #11
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,970
2,459
Sure, we've not yet discovered anything in the universe that is not computable, therefore one can extrapolate that one could maybe simulate a realistic physical universe. This however makes several assumptions: 1) That there'd be a motive for an EXTREMELY advanced Civilization to do such a thing 2) That it's physically possible and 3) That you are in one. It's lazy logic.
Indeed. It is no more or less plausible than "God made the universe and keeps it ticking".
 
  • #12
1,584
3,454
That said, if we're running on Windows, you'd imagine we would have experienced a reboot before now!
Good call!
And things in our world are getting more superficial and more expensive all the time.
Which hints at we're running on an Apple computer. :smile:
 

Related Threads on Simulation hypothesis

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
927
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Top