Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Simultaneity question

  1. Jul 24, 2013 #1
    i'm reading over the GRE prep book and i just got to the question:
    "System S' travels with constant velocity v≠0 w.r.t. system S. If two events, separated by a distance x≠0, occur simultaneously at time t in S, do they occur simultaneously in S'?"
    the answer is "No, never". But the "never" part kind of bothers me. If you held two flashlights in your hands and they both lit up at the same time while your friend was driving away from you maintaining the same distance to both lights, wouldn't the events also occur at the same time in their frame of reference?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 24, 2013 #2

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In the book example the separation is along the direction of motion; in your example the separation is perpendicular to the direction of motion.
     
  4. Jul 24, 2013 #3

    errr... where does it say the separation is along the direction of motion? :uhh:
     
  5. Jul 24, 2013 #4

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    It's assuming that the Lorentz boost is along the ##x##-direction of frame ##S## with the two events having a non-zero spatial separation ##x\neq 0## in frame ##S##. If the separation is purely perpendicular to the direction of motion (such as me holding a flashlight in each arm exactly side by side) then there won't be an anomaly. If the car is traveling along the ##x##-direction in my frame and the separation between the flash lights is ##\Delta y## i.e. ##\Delta x = 0## and I turn them both on so that ##\Delta t = 0## then ##\Delta t' = 0## trivially by the Lorentz transformations for a boost along the ##x##-direction.
     
  6. Jul 24, 2013 #5
    what i typed up was the whole question ... i dunno what kind of assumptions are supposed to be made based on that information :\ ... maybe it's just poorly worded ...
     
  7. Jul 24, 2013 #6

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Well solarmew (mew from pokemon? xD) I would have to agree that it isn't exactly worded in the most unambiguous fashion. As long as the direction of the Lorentz boost isn't exactly perpendicular to the direction of separation of the simultaneous events in frame ##S##, you can agree with the text.
     
  8. Jul 24, 2013 #7
    fair enough :P and no, no pokemons XD just "mew" as in the sound a kitty makes :3
     
  9. Jul 24, 2013 #8

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    D'aww the pokemon is cooler :p xD
     
  10. Jul 24, 2013 #9

    WannabeNewton

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Good luck on your GRE by the way!
     
  11. Jul 24, 2013 #10
    thanks, i'm gonna need it X.X ... considering i have to take it this september, the same time the three-quarter quantum sequence starts ... -___________-
     
  12. Jul 24, 2013 #11

    micromass

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Simultaneity question
  1. Simultaneity Question (Replies: 3)

Loading...