- #1
Zebulin
- 8
- 3
This question has been bothering me for decades:
Imagine a point source in space that emits one photon per second. Would the photon expand in a globe in all directions until it strikes an object or would the photon shoot off in a random direction?
Suppose you have one target ten meters away and nothing else for light years. Would that target
1. receive most or all of the radiation (as the expanding globe of light encounters it first and the wave function collapses)
or would it
2. receive only a fraction proportional to the angle of the globe that it intersects?
If you say 1, then how is this consistent with what happens from regular light sources? Why would the multi-photon case not also focus on the nearest object?
If you say 2, then how is this consistent with the explanation of the two-slit experiments that says the photon passes through both slits at once?
Imagine a point source in space that emits one photon per second. Would the photon expand in a globe in all directions until it strikes an object or would the photon shoot off in a random direction?
Suppose you have one target ten meters away and nothing else for light years. Would that target
1. receive most or all of the radiation (as the expanding globe of light encounters it first and the wave function collapses)
or would it
2. receive only a fraction proportional to the angle of the globe that it intersects?
If you say 1, then how is this consistent with what happens from regular light sources? Why would the multi-photon case not also focus on the nearest object?
If you say 2, then how is this consistent with the explanation of the two-slit experiments that says the photon passes through both slits at once?