Hi folks!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Another stupid question: Consider a Yukawa coupling [itex]\lambda \bar{\psi}_1 \psi_2 \phi[/itex] where [itex]\phi[/itex] is a scalar field in the [itex](2,-\frac{1}{2})[/itex] representation and [itex]\psi_1[/itex] and [itex]\psi_2[/itex] are lh. Weyl fields in the [itex](2,-\frac{1}{2})[/itex] and [itex](1,1)[/itex] representation of [itex]\mathrm{SU}(2) \times \mathrm{U}(1)[/itex]. Why does the occurrence of the singlet [itex](1,0)[/itex] on the rhs of

[tex](2,-\frac{1}{2}) \otimes (2,-\frac{1}{2}) \otimes (1,1) = (1,0) \oplus (3,0)[/tex]

imply that this term is gauge-invariant? What about the [itex](3,0)[/itex] part? I just can't see it.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Singlets and gauge invariance

Loading...

Similar Threads for Singlets gauge invariance |
---|

I Question about gauge invariance and the A-B effect |

I Do the SU(n) generators represent any observables? |

I Gauge Symmetry |

Insights Mathematical Quantum Field Theory - Gauge Fixing - Comments |

I LS-Coupling: intuition why 2p^2 has no singlet P? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**