Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sizes of black holes

  1. Dec 12, 2012 #1
    If a black hole is a stellar structure that has collapsed on itself to a singularity does that mean it has no size? But is so defined by its mass and schwarzschild radius?
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 12, 2012 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    The black hole has a size defined by the event horizon. The actual volume and such is a bit more complicated to determine due to spacetime curvature I believe. A singularity, IF it exists at all, would have no size.
  4. Dec 12, 2012 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Current physical theory is unable to accurately describe what is going on inside the event horizon of a black hole. Quantum theory and general relativity don't mesh, and they both come into play.
  5. Jan 3, 2013 #4
    The thing to realise is that the term 'black hole' doesn't mean: 'the bit at the center where all of the mass is concentrated, that may or may not be a singularity'.

    'black hole' refers to the whole volume inside the event horizon, which clearly can have a radius, surface area and volume.

    my understanding is that non-rotating black holes are perfect spheres with a radii equal to their Schwarzchild radius, and that rotating black holes are distorted into oblate spheroids, as are most rotating stellar objects.
  6. Jan 4, 2013 #5
    A Schwarzschild blackhole singularity is a mathematical point, yes, and so is a Nordström black hole singularity. But Kerr and Newman black hole singularities are one dimensional - they have no thickness, but they have circumference, radius etc.
  7. Jan 6, 2013 #6
    How can it be one dimensional with a circumference and a radius? does that make it 2 dimensional?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook