- #1
maggiomail
- 4
- 0
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
The balloon would have to be rigid and withstand huge forces. With known materials, that would make it heavier than the air it displaces.Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
Why can't we fill the balloon with the lightest substance available, i.e. vacuum?
300 miles up, we have space with an extremely good vacuum (most satellites are there, flying for years without falling down). The density is way too low to use balloons there.Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?
You can increase their maximal height with a valve, but that does not reduce the mass of the hull - at some point, air pressure is too low to generate the required lifting force.Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
Helium balloons explode if they go sufficiently high, presumedly from excess pressure?
It can't be as simple as to install a pressure relief valve..
Wonder how big a part radiation and subzero temperatures would play, say, 300 miles up?