Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math

In summary, the conversation discusses the meaning of the symbol "d" in mathematics, specifically in relation to calculus and derivatives. The term "infinitesimal" is suggested as a possible translation, but it is noted that "d" does not have a separate meaning and is instead used to represent small changes in a function. The terms "derivative" and "differential" are also mentioned in relation to the symbol "d". The conversation also briefly touches on the use of derivatives in physics, specifically in the context of special relativity.
  • #1
Stephanus
1,316
104
Dear PF Forum,
I'm studying Relativity,
And there's some term in math that I don't know. And I am even not an English native.
in ##\frac{dX}{dY}## What does "d" mean?
I know that dX is the tiny slice of X. What do we say it in English?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Dr. Courtney said:
That's pretty good. I like the word infinitesimal, but tiny is good.
I know I should have asked this in "Langauge forum"? :smile:
So, "infinitesimal" is the antonym of "infinite"?
 
  • #4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinitesimal

Stephanus said:
I know I should have asked this in "Langauge forum"? :smile:
So, "infinitesimal" is the antonym of "infinite"?

The words "opposite" and "antonym" are too imprecise in english to be of much use in mathematics.

What is the opposite of x? Is it -x? Or is it 1/x?

What is the opposite of INF? Is it -INF? Or is it 1/INF? Something else?
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #5
Dr. Courtney said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinitesimal
The words "opposite" and "antonym" are too imprecise in english to be of much use in mathematics.

What is the opposite of x? Is it -x? Or is it 1/x?

What is the opposite of INF? Is it -INF? Or is it 1/INF? Something else?
THAT'S RIGHT. Another good point for me. Thanks.
So dX is if you slice X again and again and again,... to infinity.
[Add: Just for fun,
If you challenge me, "How do you slice X? In half or 1/3 or 1/4 or...?
Supposed we divide the biggest part of X with n = 1/3
1. There is X -> A: 1/3 and B: 2/3
2. Divide the biggest part; B: 2/3 -> C: 2/9 and D: 4/9
3. Divide the biggest part; D: 4/9 -> E: 2/27 and F: 4/27
4. Divide the biggest part: A: 1/3 -> G: 1/9 and H: 2/9
5. Divide the biggest part; A or C: 2/9 -> etc...
No matter what method you choose for n, dX still infinitesimal]
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
  • #6
Your mistake is in thinking that "d" has a separate meaning! "dy/dx" is defined as a single entity, the "derivative of function y with respect to variable x. That is defined early in an introductory Calculus course. A little later in such a course, we define the quantities "dy" and "dx", separately, in such a way that "dy" divided by "dx" is equal to the single quantity "dy/dx" originally defined. But we do NOT define "d" as a separate quantity.

(You can calculate an approximation to "dy/dx" by using "small changes in y divided by small changes in x" giving the idea that "d" means "small changes in" but that is just a "mnemonic".)
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #7
Isn't d/dy considered as an operator on x?
 
  • #8
HallsofIvy said:
Your mistake is in thinking that "d" has a separate meaning! "dy/dx" is defined as a single entity, the "derivative of function y with respect to variable x. That is defined early in an introductory Calculus course. A little later in such a course, we define the quantities "dy" and "dx", separately, in such a way that "dy" divided by "dx" is equal to the single quantity "dy/dx" originally defined. But we do NOT define "d" as a separate quantity.

(You can calculate an approximation to "dy/dx" by using "small changes in y divided by small changes in x" giving the idea that "d" means "small changes in" but that is just a "mnemonic".)
Yes, HallsofIvy.
If you divide dX by dY in Y = X3 + n, you'll get the gradient, or if you touch a ruler to that point. Y = 3X2
If you divide dX by dY in C2 = x2+y2, you'll get the tangent.
But as a non English speaker, I want to know what is the "word" for d.
"Derivative" is a good one.
I just can't keep saying for dX/dY like this:
"You should take the very very small part of X and divide it by the very very small part of Y and ..."
This one is better
"Take the derivative of X/Y and..."
Dr. Courtney choosen of word is good "Infinitesimal", and yours too. "Derivative".
Perhaps I would use both of them. Derivative seems good.Now, I can go back to Special Relativity (SR) and ask this question
"In ##U^\mu = \frac{dX^\mu}{d\tau}## why do we have to use the derivative of X instead of X only". Seems good sentence? :smile:And it just hits me with this SR thing. Am I being fooled by SR. In the past 3 months I was just doing math, and math, and math. Not a single thing about physics??
 
  • #9
Stephanus said:
Yes, HallsofIvy.
If you divide dX by dY in Y = X3 + n, you'll get the gradient, or if you touch a ruler to that point. Y = 3X2
No, you don't divide dX by dY. If Y is a function of X, as above, you can find the derivative of Y with respect to X, or dY/dX (usually read as "dee Y dee X"). This new function gives you the slope of the tangent line on the original function at an arbitrary point.
Stephanus said:
If you divide dX by dY in C2 = x2+y2, you'll get the tangent.
Here you can use implicit differentiation to find either dX/dY or dY/dX. The latter, dY/dX, gives the slope of the tangent line at an arbitrary point on the circle that the equation represents. It's called implicit differentiation because the equation doesn't give either X or Y as a function of the other variable.

Since mathematicians normally use lower case letters, I'm going to switch to the more-used form, dy/dx etc.
Stephanus said:
But as a non English speaker, I want to know what is the "word" for d.
"Derivative" is a good one.
No, it isn't. If you are given that, say, y = x2, for example, the differential of y, denoted dy, is often defined as ##dy = \frac{dy}{dx} \cdot dx = 2x dx##. Here dy is the differential of y and dx is the differential of x.
Stephanus said:
I just can't keep saying for dX/dY like this:
"You should take the very very small part of X and divide it by the very very small part of Y and ..."
This one is better
"Take the derivative of X/Y and..."
Dr. Courtney choosen of word is good "Infinitesimal", and yours too. "Derivative".
Perhaps I would use both of them. Derivative seems good.Now, I can go back to Special Relativity (SR) and ask this question
"In ##U^\mu = \frac{dX^\mu}{d\tau}## why do we have to use the derivative of X instead of X only". Seems good sentence? :smile:
I'm not familiar with this equation, but it seems to be defining ##U^{\mu}##. On the right side is the derivative of ##x^{\mu}## (not the derivative of x) with respect to ##\tau##.
Stephanus said:
And it just hits me with this SR thing. Am I being fooled by SR. In the past 3 months I was just doing math, and math, and math. Not a single thing about physics??
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #10
For dy/dx we say "dee wye bye dee eks" or sometimes "dee bye dee eks ov wye". We can also say "the derivative of y with respect to x", or if it is obvious from the context what we are differentiating by just "the derivative of y". I think Dr Courtney misunderstood what you were asking because we would not normally use "infinitesimal" in this way.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #11
MrAnchovy said:
For dy/dx we say "dee wye bye dee eks" or sometimes "dee bye dee eks ov wye".
This might be a cultural thing. In my experience of the past 50 years, in the US we say for dy/dx, "dee wye dee eks" without the "by" or "of."
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk
  • #12
I have found it useful to focus on d/dx as an operator that differentiates what it acts on with respect to x. dy/dx = (d/dx) y
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk
  • #13
Mark44 said:
This might be a cultural thing. In my experience of the past 50 years, in the US we say for dy/dx, "dee wye dee eks" without the "by" or "of."
My experience of calculus in the UK only goes back 35 years, and "dee wye dee eks" is certainly something that would always have been well understood, and possibly the prefererence now.
 
  • #14
MrAnchovy said:
My experience of calculus in the UK only goes back 35 years, and "dee wye dee eks" is certainly something that would always have been well understood, and possibly the prefererence now.

I worked as a math teacher in high school up to two years ago and "dee wye dee eks" was the norm in the department.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #15
Being aware of how students can get the wrong impression from certain notations, I try and mix in a fair amount of:

d/dt [x(t)]

and

d/dx [f(x)]

and other forms where the letter specifying the function and the input variable are frequently different from y and x.

Students need to understand calculus with a wide variety of functions and input variables. Sticking to religiously to y as the output and x as the input works against this understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #16
MrAnchovy said:
For dy/dx we say "dee wye bye dee eks" or sometimes "dee bye dee eks ov wye". We can also say "the derivative of y with respect to x", or if it is obvious from the context what we are differentiating by just "the derivative of y". I think Dr Courtney misunderstood what you were asking because we would not normally use "infinitesimal" in this way.
Yes, in voice :smile:. How do you type it in written? Because I was trying to understand SR, and there's something like that. ##U^{\mu} = \frac{dX^{\mu'}}{d\tau}##. And I wanted to express my question in 'English'.
Something like: "Why we should divide the dee eks(distance) by the dee tau (time)?"
But I read many useful math concepts from this thread beside the question that I asked here.
 
  • #17
MrAnchovy said:
For dy/dx we say "dee wye bye dee eks" or sometimes "dee bye dee eks ov wye". We can also say "the derivative of y with respect to x", or if it is obvious from the context what we are differentiating by just "the derivative of y". I think Dr Courtney misunderstood what you were asking because we would not normally use "infinitesimal" in this way.

See: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/infincalc.htm

My answer was intentional. The word "infinitesimal" probably should be used more often in the teaching and learning of Calculus. Newton and Leibniz did intend the derivative to be understood as an [(infinitesimal of the input variable) divided by an (infinitesimal of the output variable) ].

Thus, I believe understanding "d" as an infinitesimal is correct and what I intended.
 
  • #18
Mark44 said:
No, you don't divide dX by dY. If Y is a function of X, as above, you can find the derivative of Y with respect to X, or dY/dX (usually read as "dee Y dee X"). This new function gives you the slope of the tangent line on the original function at an arbitrary point.
Ahh, I put it upside down. After 30 years from high school, I should have joined "Are you smarter than fifth grader"
Yes, I remember. The gradient of vertical line is infinity right. And horizontal line is zero.
Should have written ##\frac{dY}{dX}##
Mark44 said:
Here you can use implicit differentiation to find either dX/dY or dY/dX. The latter, dY/dX, gives the slope of the tangent line at an arbitrary point on the circle that the equation represents. It's called implicit differentiation because the equation doesn't give either X or Y as a function of the other variable.
Okay, okay.

Mark44 said:
Since mathematicians normally use lower case letters, I'm going to switch to the more-used form, dy/dx etc.
Ok.

Mark44 said:
I'm not familiar with this equation, but it seems to be defining ##U^{\mu}##. On the right side is the derivative of ##x^{\mu}## (not the derivative of x) with respect to ##\tau##.
Yes! In math language.
But what is in 'English'
My problem is...
From ##\frac{dx^{\mu'}}{d\tau}## It's the (a)tiny/(b)slice/(c)derivative distance divided by (a)tiny/(b)slice/(c)derivative time so it's velocity at that particular time. It's the English that I want to know before I go back to SR forum again and ask my question in a better sentence.
I'm not an English speaker, I wasn't definitely went to English school before. So I don't know the word for this dX.
I'm aware if you have a curve, say y = x2. Then you touch a ruler to that curve in some arbitrary point, say in x=5, so the gradient of your ruler is ##\frac{dY}{dX}##, right. = 6, correction: 10
Thanks for your answer.
Gradient = ##\frac{dx}{dy}## :headbang::headbang:

[Add: I know the number, I know the result, I don't know the 'English']
 
  • #19
Stephanus said:
Yes! In math language.
But what is in 'English'
My problem is...
From ##\frac{dx^{\mu}}{d\tau}## It's the (a)tiny/(b)slice/(c)derivative distance divided by (a)tiny/(b)slice/(c)derivative time so it's velocity at that particular time.
No, it's the rate of change of ##x^{\mu}## with respect to ##\tau## or the derivative of ##x^{\mu}## with respect to ##\tau##. I don't see how this would be a velocity at all, even if ##\tau## happens to represent time.
Stephanus said:
It's the English that I want to know before I go back to SR forum again and ask my question in a better sentence.
I can't say it any better than I did just above without knowing what ##x^{\mu}## represents.
Stephanus said:
I'm not an English speaker, I wasn't definitely went to English school before. So I don't know the word for this dX.
As I said already, dx is the differential of x.
Stephanus said:
I'm aware if you have a curve, say y = x2. Then you touch a ruler to that curve in some arbitrary point, say in x=5, so the gradient of your ruler is ##\frac{dY}{dX}##, right. = 6, correction: 10
Right, the slope of the tangent line to y = x2 at x = 5 is 10. In other words, ##\frac{dy}{dx} |_{x = 5} = 10##.
Stephanus said:
Thanks for your answer.
Gradient = ## \frac{dx}{dy}## :headbang::headbang:
No, this would normally be dy/dx, not dx/dy.
Stephanus said:
[Add: I know the number, I know the result, I don't know the 'English']
 
  • #20
Mark44 said:
No, it's the rate of change of ##x^{\mu}## with respect to ##\tau## or the derivative of ##x^{\mu}## with respect to ##\tau##. I don't see how this would be a velocity at all, even if ##\tau## happens to represent time.
This equation is from this: http://www.lecture-notes.co.uk/susskind/special-relativity/lecture-6/relativistic-kinematics/

[..]If we suppose that the velocity of a particle is changing over time - that is, it can accelerate and decelarate - then the particle's rest frame is not necessarily an inertial reference frame. However, at any given time (either proper time or coordinate time), we can consider a frame that, at that instant, is moving at the same velocity as the particle and has the particle at its origin.

When we talk about the particle frame, we shall really mean this ‘momentarily co-moving reference frame’, and use primed coordinates to refer to it. In this frame, we have

Position: ##X^{\mu'} \rightarrow (\tau,0,0,0)##
Velocity: ##U^{\mu'} = \frac{dX^{\mu'}}{d\tau} \rightarrow (1,0,0,0)##
Momentum: ##P^{\mu'} = mU^{\mu'} \rightarrow (m,0,0,0)##
And I wonder, why Velocity is ##U^{\mu'} = \frac{dX^{\mu'}}{d\tau} \rightarrow (1,0,0,0)##?It's not the equation that I ask, it's the English.
Does velocity change? Is it acceleration? I wanted to ask the question in a better English, that's why I ask about this "d".

Then I saw one paragraph above:
[..]If we suppose that the velocity of a particle is changing over time - that is, it can accelerate and decelarate - then the particle's rest frame is not necessarily an inertial reference frame. However, at any given time (either proper time or coordinate time), we can consider a frame that, at that instant, is moving at the same velocity as the particle and has the particle at its origin.
So I have already canceled my question in SR Forum, but then I discussed math instead.
It's not the math that I ask, it's the English.
Okay, one more example:
the ##\frac{sin(dx)}{dx} = cos(x)## It's just the 'English' that I don't know.
The ... sin(dx)/dx is cos(x)?
You say, 'derivative', I like it. Other says diferential, infinitesimal. I, the math ignorance :smile:, say "slice".
Btw, thanks for your answer. Your answer has given me other knowledge about math, too.
 
  • #21
Stephanus said:
This equation is from this: http://www.lecture-notes.co.uk/susskind/special-relativity/lecture-6/relativistic-kinematics/And I wonder, why Velocity is ##U^{\mu'} = \frac{dX^{\mu'}}{d\tau} \rightarrow (1,0,0,0)##?It's not the equation that I ask, it's the English.
##X^{\mu}## is the position. As a 4-vector it is (##\tau##, 0, 0, 0) - as given in what you quoted from the lecture notes.
The velocity, is given as ##\frac{dX^{\mu}}{d\tau}##. This is just the rate of change of the position with respect to ##\tau##, so the 4-vector would be (1, 0, 0, 0). The first coordinate of the position vector is ##\tau##, so differentiating with respect to ##\tau## gives 1 in that position. All other coordinates of the position vector are 0, so their derivatives are zero as well.

Stephanus said:
Does velocity change? Is it acceleration?
Yes and yes.
Stephanus said:
I wanted to ask the question in a better English, that's why I ask about this "d".
##d\tau## (for example) is the differential of ##\tau##, an infinitesimally small quantity.
Stephanus said:
Then I saw one paragraph above:So I have already canceled my question in SR Forum, but then I discussed math instead.
It's not the math that I ask, it's the English.
Okay, one more example:
the ##\frac{sin(dx)}{dx} = cos(x)## It's just the 'English' that I don't know.
The ... sin(dx)/dx is cos(x)?
I don't think you understand the math, either. What you have above should be ##\frac{d(sin(x))}{dx} = cos(x)##, or ##\frac{d}{dx} \{sin(x)\} = cos(x)##, NOT ##\frac{sin(dx)}{dx} = cos(x)##. In words, the derivative with respect to x of sin(x) is cos(x). This relationship shows up in the first quarter or semester of calculus.
Stephanus said:
You say, 'derivative', I like it. Other says diferential, infinitesimal. I, the math ignorance :smile:, say "slice".
Btw, thanks for your answer. Your answer has given me other knowledge about math, too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #22
Mark44 said:
I don't think you understand the math, either. What you have above should be ##\frac{d(sin(x))}{dx} = cos(x)##, or ##\frac{d}{dx} \{sin(x)\} = cos(x)##, NOT ##\frac{sin(dx)}{dx} = cos(x)##. In words, the derivative with respect to x of sin(x) is cos(x). This relationship shows up in the first quarter or semester of calculus.
Yes, it's not sin (dx) but d sin(x)
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
  • #23
Dr. Courtney said:
See: http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/infincalc.htm

My answer was intentional. The word "infinitesimal" probably should be used more often in the teaching and learning of Calculus. Newton and Leibniz did intend the derivative to be understood as an [(infinitesimal of the input variable) divided by an (infinitesimal of the output variable) ].

Thus, I believe understanding "d" as an infinitesimal is correct and what I intended.

I don't agree. I believe that it is important to understand that ## \frac{d}{dx} f(x) ## is shorthand for ## \lim_{h \to 0} \frac {f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} ##; talking about "an infinitesimal of f(x)" before you have confidently grasped that concept is, I believe, confusing.
 
  • #24
MrAnchovy said:
I don't agree. I believe that it is important to understand that ## \frac{d}{dx} f(x) ## is shorthand for ## \lim_{h \to 0} \frac {f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} ##; talking about "an infinitesimal of f(x)" before you have confidently grasped that concept is, I believe, confusing.

There is a lot of calculus left in a good course after the limit definition of derivative has been mastered. Some teachers might choose to wait to introduce the word infinitesimal to the discussion, but I believe well-trained students will have heard it a lot by the end.
 
  • #25
Are you talking about a rigorous introduction of hyperreal analysis or the naive use of infinitesimals by Leibniz and Newton's "fluxions"? If it is the latter then I can't agree with you: the proof of the chain rule is not as simple as writing $$ \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{dx} \cdot 1 = \frac{dy}{dx} \cdot \frac{dz}{dz} = \frac{dy}{dz} \cdot \frac{dz}{dx} $$ until you have proved some properties of the hyperreals.
 
  • #26
It would be less confusing if Euler's notation ## D_x y ## had stuck.
 
  • #27
Mark44 said:
I don't think you understand the math, either. What you have above should be ##\frac{d(sin(x))}{dx} = cos(x)##, or ##\frac{d}{dx} \{sin(x)\} = cos(x)##, NOT ##\frac{sin(dx)}{dx} = cos(x)##. In words, the derivative with respect to x of sin(x) is cos(x). This relationship shows up in the first quarter or semester of calculus.
Yes, what I wrote was wrong sin (dx).
Thinking it over while driving 90kmh on highway in my way home. It's like
(sin(2.0000001)-sin(2)/0.000001
It is not
sin(0.000001)/0.00001, it's different.
I think you know what I mean by 0.00001, it's d = lim -> 0.
(Could have written 0.00000000000000000001, but the concept is the same).
 
  • #28
MrAnchovy said:
I don't agree. I believe that it is important to understand that ## \frac{d}{dx} f(x) ## is shorthand for ## \lim_{h \to 0} \frac {f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} ##; talking about "an infinitesimal of f(x)" before you have confidently grasped that concept is, I believe, confusing.
Come on MrAnchovy. Like Dr. Courtney said, it's the word "infinitesimal" that I'm looking for. It's not the math. But well, I choose "derivative". But the concept is exactly what you write.
Limit d ≈ 0. ##\frac{sin(x+d)-sin(x)}{d}##
 
  • #29
Stephanus said:
Limit d ≈ 0. ##\frac{sin(x+d)-sin(x)}{d}##
This makes no sense. d by itself has no meaning here.
 
  • #30
Mark44 said:
This makes no sense. d by itself has no meaning here.
Yes, sorry. Not d, but h.
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{sin(x+h)-sin(x)}{(x+h)-(x)}##.
the (x+h)-(x). It is in the form of ##\frac{f(a)-f(b)}{a-b}##, right.
Should have change the letter d.

and this one is what I think that doesn't makes sense, see below.
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{sin(h)}{h}##.

[Add: could have written ##lim_{d \rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x+d)-f(x)}{d}##
But "d" here doesn't have any meaning right. It's just a variable.
But in this case, ##V^{\mu} = \frac{dx}{d\tau}##, now in this context, d has a meaning.

]
 
  • #31
Just want to add one thing.
I just realized that writing sin(x+h)-sin(x) = sin(h) is somewhat forgiveable.
But, writing cos(x+h)-cos(x) = cos(h) is really unforgiven. Should have remembered it "religiously" like the above post said.
 
  • #32
Stephanus said:
Yes, sorry. Not d, but h.
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{sin(x+h)-sin(x)}{(x+h)-(x)}##.
the (x+h)-(x). It is in the form of ##\frac{f(a)-f(b)}{a-b}##, right.
Should have change the letter d.

and this one is what I think that doesn't makes sense, see below.
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{sin(h)}{h}##.
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{sin(h)}{h} = 1##, a fact that is proven in most calculus textbooks. It's not immediatedly obvious, but you can check that it is reasonable by evaluating ##\frac{sin(h)} h## for smaller and smaller values of h (in radians).
Stephanus said:
[Add: could have written ##lim_{d \rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x+d)-f(x)}{d}##
But "d" here doesn't have any meaning right. It's just a variable.
But in this case, ##V^{\mu} = \frac{dx}{d\tau}##, now in this context, d has a meaning.
In your first example above, d does have a meaning -- as you say it's a variable.
In your second example, d by itself has no meaning, but ##\frac{dx}{d\tau}## means the derivative of x with respect to ##\tau##. By definition ##\frac{dx}{d\tau} = \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{x(\tau + h) - x(\tau)}{h}##

Stephanus said:
Just want to add one thing.
I just realized that writing sin(x+h)-sin(x) = sin(h) is somewhat forgiveable.
Why? This is not true.
Stephanus said:
But, writing cos(x+h)-cos(x) = cos(h) is really unforgiven. Should have remembered it "religiously" like the above post said.
I don't see the difference here. Neither one is true.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
  • #33
Mark44 said:
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{sin(h)}{h} = 1##, a fact that is proven in most calculus textbooks[..]
Yes, this is a FACT!. I don't argue about it either.
Mark44 said:
Stephanus said:
I just realized that writing sin(x+h)-sin(x) = sin(h) is somewhat forgiveable.
Why? This is not true.
Stephanus said:
But, writing cos(x+h)-cos(x) = cos(h) is really unforgiven. Should have remembered it "religiously" like the above post said.
I don't see the difference here. Neither one is true.
Come on Mark114, give me some slack :smile:
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} sin(h)## is almost zero, too. But of course ##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} sin(h) ≠ (sin(x+h)-sin(x))##
And of course ##cos(h)## is a light year away from ##cos(x+h)-cos(x)##
While ##sin(h)## is, I could say, in the neighborhood of ##sin(x+h)-sin(x)##, that's why I made a mistake with the statement above. sin(dx) while what I meant is d sin(x)
 
  • #34
Mark44 said:
In your second example, d by itself has no meaning, but ##\frac{dx}{d\tau}## means the derivative of x with respect to ##\tau##. By definition ##\frac{dx}{d\tau} = \lim_{h \to 0}\frac{x(\tau + h) - x(\tau)}{h}##
Oh.
Thanks, that helps me much in understanding SR.

Btw, about this ##\frac{dx}{d\tau}##. As you know in SR (Special Relativity) they often use X/T as their function not T/X (or Y/X) as in real 'math'.
That's why I made an error by saying gradient is X/Y, while what I meant is Y/X.
Of course in 'math', the gradient for vertical length is undefined, but in SR a vertical line as you know, is a rest frame.
While in SR, the horizontal line is undefined, velocity is instant, but in 'math' a horizontal line is Y = n, the gradient is zero.
 
  • #35
Stephanus said:
Yes, this is a FACT!. I don't argue about it either.
Come on Mark114, give me some slack :smile:
##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} sin(h)## is almost zero, too.
No, not almost zero. ##\lim_{h \to 0} \sin(h)## IS zero.
Stephanus said:
But of course ##lim_{h \rightarrow 0} sin(h) ≠ (sin(x+h)-sin(x))##
And of course ##cos(h)## is a light year away from ##cos(x+h)-cos(x)##
While ##sin(h)## is, I could say, in the neighborhood of ##sin(x+h)-sin(x)##, that's why I made a mistake with the statement above. sin(dx) while what I meant is d sin(x)
 
<h2>1. What is "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math"?</h2><p>"Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" is a mathematical concept that explores the relationship between two variables, dX and dY, and how they change relative to each other.</p><h2>2. How is "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" related to the theory of relativity?</h2><p>While the concept of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" shares a name with the theory of relativity, they are not directly related. The concept of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" focuses on the mathematical relationship between two variables, while the theory of relativity is a scientific theory that explains the behavior of objects in space and time.</p><h2>3. What are dX and dY in "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math"?</h2><p>dX and dY are variables that represent the change in two quantities, such as distance and time, in a mathematical equation. They are used to explore the relationship between these two quantities and how they change relative to each other.</p><h2>4. How is "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" used in science?</h2><p>"Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" is used in science to understand and model the relationship between two variables, such as in physics equations that describe the motion of objects. It can also be applied in other fields, such as economics and engineering, to analyze and predict how different variables will change in relation to each other.</p><h2>5. What are some real-world applications of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math"?</h2><p>Some real-world applications of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" include predicting the trajectory of a projectile, analyzing the relationship between supply and demand in economics, and understanding the behavior of electrical circuits. It can also be used in fields such as astronomy, chemistry, and biology to model and study various phenomena.</p>

1. What is "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math"?

"Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" is a mathematical concept that explores the relationship between two variables, dX and dY, and how they change relative to each other.

2. How is "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" related to the theory of relativity?

While the concept of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" shares a name with the theory of relativity, they are not directly related. The concept of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" focuses on the mathematical relationship between two variables, while the theory of relativity is a scientific theory that explains the behavior of objects in space and time.

3. What are dX and dY in "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math"?

dX and dY are variables that represent the change in two quantities, such as distance and time, in a mathematical equation. They are used to explore the relationship between these two quantities and how they change relative to each other.

4. How is "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" used in science?

"Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" is used in science to understand and model the relationship between two variables, such as in physics equations that describe the motion of objects. It can also be applied in other fields, such as economics and engineering, to analyze and predict how different variables will change in relation to each other.

5. What are some real-world applications of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math"?

Some real-world applications of "Relativity: Exploring dX and dY in Math" include predicting the trajectory of a projectile, analyzing the relationship between supply and demand in economics, and understanding the behavior of electrical circuits. It can also be used in fields such as astronomy, chemistry, and biology to model and study various phenomena.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
610
  • General Math
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
809
  • Calculus
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
829
Back
Top