Slope and Projectile Problem: Finding Distance Covered on a Landing Slope

In summary, Eddie "The Eagle" Edwards takes off on the 90 m ski-jump with a horizontal velocity of 20 m/s and lands on a slope with a gradient of East 37 South. Using the conservation of energy will not work in this situation. Instead, it is necessary to look at Eddie's trajectory as a function of horizontal displacement and the line of the ski slope as a function of horizontal displacement. This can be represented by a parabolic trajectory for Eddie and a straight line for the ski slope, intersecting at a point. The equations for these two functions can be written as y = mx and y = -ax, respectively.
  • #36
Lolagoeslala said:
y = gt^2/2

Okay. Now, is y increasing or decreasing in value as time moves forward? (Is the skier rising or falling?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
gneill said:
Okay. Now, is y increasing or decreasing in value as time moves forward? (Is the skier rising or falling?)

he is falling so there needs to be a negative sign infront of it
 
  • #38
Lolagoeslala said:
he is falling so there needs to be a negative sign infront of it

Good.

Now, you've got your two parametric equations for the trajectory:

##x(t) = v_x t##

##y(t) = -\frac{1}{2}g t^2##

Can you combine them to write y in terms of x? (that is, eliminate t in the equation for y)
 
  • #39
gneill said:
Good.

Now, you've got your two parametric equations for the trajectory:

##x(t) = v_x t##

##y(t) = -\frac{1}{2}g t^2##

Can you combine them to write y in terms of x? (that is, eliminate t in the equation for y)

y(t) = - 1/2 g (x/v)^2
 
  • #40
Lolagoeslala said:
y(t) = - 1/2 g (x/v)^2

Alright. But no y(t) any more. It's y(x). The t has been eliminated. That's the equation of the parabola that the skier follows.

So now you have the equation of the line representing the ski slope and the parabola representing the skier's path. Can you find their intersection?
 
  • #41
gneill said:
Alright. But no y(t) any more. It's y(x). The t has been eliminated. That's the equation of the parabola that the skier follows.

So now you have the equation of the line representing the ski slope and the parabola representing the skier's path. Can you find their intersection?

y(x) = - 1/2 g (x/v)^2
x = -3/4

y(x) = - 1/2 g (-3/4v)^2
y(x) = - 1/2 g (-3/4v)^2
y(x) = 0.00689
 
  • #42
Lolagoeslala said:
y(x) = - 1/2 g (x/v)^2
x = -3/4 <---
No, that's not right; x is not a constant. Where's your equation for the line? Look back to posts #23 and #24.
 
  • #43
y =- 3/4x
y(x) = - 1/2 g (x/v)^2


-3/4x = -1/2g(x/v)^2
3/4x = 1/2g(x/v)^2
3/4x = 1/2gx^2/v^2
2 x 3/4 x v^2 / g= x
600/g = x
61.22 = x
 
  • #44
Lolagoeslala said:
y =- 3/4x
y(x) = - 1/2 g (x/v)^2


-3/4x = -1/2g(x/v)^2
3/4x = 1/2g(x/v)^2
3/4x = 1/2gx^2/v^2
2 x 3/4 x v^2 / g= x
600/g = x
61.22 = x

That looks better!

So that's the value of x where the curves intersect. Can you now find L, the distance along the slope?
 
  • #45
gneill said:
That looks better!

So that's the value of x where the curves intersect. Can you now find L, the distance along the slope?

ok so i know where they intersect which is 61.22
wouldn't the length be 61.22 too?
 
  • #46
Lolagoeslala said:
ok so i know where they intersect which is 61.22
wouldn't the length be 61.22 too?

Nope. That's the horizontal distance. You're looking for the distance along the slope. The 'L' in your diagram.
 
  • #47
Ok i see so itll be like this..

horizontal distance = 61.22 m
L = ?
Angle = 37°

cos 37° = a/61.22 m
cos 37°x 61.22m = a
and the L is 48.89 m
 
  • #48
Lolagoeslala said:
Ok i see so itll be like this..

horizontal distance = 61.22 m
L = ?
Angle = 37°

cos 37° = a/61.22 m
cos 37°x 61.22m = a
and the L is 48.89 m

Bit of a problem with your working there. Consider,... is the hypotenuse of a triangle ever shorter than either of the other sides? Here L is the hypotenuse of a triangle with one side of length 61.22 m. Draw your triangle with the 'x' side and 'L' hypotenuse in place and redo the calculation.
 
  • #49
gneill said:
Bit of a problem with your working there. Consider,... is the hypotenuse of a triangle ever shorter than either of the other sides? Here L is the hypotenuse of a triangle with one side of length 61.22 m. Draw your triangle with the 'x' side and 'L' hypotenuse in place and redo the calculation.

http://s1176.beta.photobucket.com/user/LolaGoesLala/media/Untitled_zps4a736718.jpg.html#/user/LolaGoesLala/media/Untitled_zps4a736718.jpg.html?&_suid=135745223970705186732013962768

like this?
 
  • #50
Lolagoeslala said:
http://s1176.beta.photobucket.com/user/LolaGoesLala/media/Untitled_zps4a736718.jpg.html#/user/LolaGoesLala/media/Untitled_zps4a736718.jpg.html?&_suid=135745223970705186732013962768

like this?

Yup. Be sure to indicate where the known angle is.

Alternatively, you could use geometry and similar triangles since you know that this triangle is similar to the 3-4-5 triangle from your initial diagram.
 
  • #51
Okay so what i was thinking was i could find the side that is opposite to the angle
so like

tan 37 = o / 61.22 m
o = 46.13 m

and use a^2 = b^2 + c^2
a^2 = (61.22m)^2 + (46.13m)^2
a= 76.6 or 77
 
  • #52
Lolagoeslala said:
Okay so what i was thinking was i could find the side that is opposite to the angle
so like

tan 37 = o / 61.22 m
o = 46.13 m

and use a^2 = b^2 + c^2
a^2 = (61.22m)^2 + (46.13m)^2
a= 76.6 or 77

That'll do it. But it's kind of taking the long way around :smile:

You can write ##cos(\theta) = x/L## so that ##L = x/cos(\theta)##, and cos(θ) can be obtained from the similar 3-4-5 triangle as cos(θ) = 4/5.

attachment.php?attachmentid=54489&stc=1&d=1357477300.gif


Or, avoiding trig functions altogether, you can use the "raw geometry" of similar triangles:

##\frac{L}{x} = \frac{5}{4}## so that ##L = x \frac{5}{4}##

where x is 61.18 m, of course.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.2 KB · Views: 465
  • #53
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP!
u r like a god to me :D
 
  • #54
Lolagoeslala said:
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR HELP!
u r like a god to me :D

Careful, my ego may explode :eek:

Glad I could help. Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
774
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
744
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
887
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
812
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
988
Back
Top