Smallest Distance: How We Feel Things Without Touching

  • Thread starter CyberShot
  • Start date
In summary: So, at the infinitely smallest scale something has to give and the smallest unit of "information" has to teleport two unimaginably tiny points in space.
  • #1
CyberShot
133
2
Have you ever wondered how the hell we actually "feel" things without touching them. The atoms in my fingers and the atoms of the keyboards get extremely close to each other, but you can always imagine them getting closer and closer without actually touching.

How is it then that I am able to type this post, if my fingers technically never touch the keyboard? I am thinking that this requires there to be a smallest distance; either that or the electromagnetic repulsive force is "jumping" the very small space between the atoms.

Has anybody ever thought of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, what we call "touching" is simply the point where electron resistance becomes high enough to convey kinetic energy, right? So we do touch things.
 
  • #3
Yes, but how is that "signal" information transferred between space, if it has to jump very small distances, to impart kinetic energy? Do you get what I'm saying.
 
  • #4
Your fingers electrons push the keyboards electrons with a repulsive force this forces range is infinetly ling but the closer your hand gets too the keyboard the harder the repulsive force.
 
  • #5
CyberShot said:
Yes, but how is that "signal" information transferred between space, if it has to jump very small distances, to impart kinetic energy? Do you get what I'm saying.

The force from the electrons in your hand is transferred to the keyboard through the electromagnetic field, like every other electromagnetic interaction.

The reason why this force is only felt at small distances is because, on the whole, your body and the keyboard are both electrically neutral. So, when they are far away, your hand looks like a neutral object to the keyboard, and vice-versa. Thus, the net force between the two is 0.

When your finger is very close to the keyboard, the electrons in the keyboard can start to feel the interaction from the electrons on the surface of your hand. At this close range, the effect of the positive charges in your hand is less, since the electrons in both the surface of your fingers and the surface of the keys are much closer to each other than they are to the positive charges.

In this example, we can say that the interaction is "screened" by the presence of the positive charges i.e. you can feel it at very short distances, but it's strength drops off rapidly as the distance between the two objects increases. (Effectively, we are left with a "hard-core" repulsion potential, which drops off like 1/r^11.)

Consider this simpler example:

When two atoms are far apart, there is no net force between them, as they are electrically neutral.

When you bring the atoms together, the electron clouds will, at very short distances, be closer to each other then to their respective nuclei, and thus the atoms will feel a net repulsion.EDIT:

I've been talking with a friend about this question and realized, for instance, we will also have the Van der Waals force, which will tend to attract the two bodies (drops off as 1/r^7). However, as it does not cause repulsion, I'll continue to ignore it for this educational example.

Secondly, my fellow grad student also pointed out that Pauli exclusion also probably plays a role, but, I think it's fair to focus on the electrostatic repulsion effects for this elementary discussion.

Finally, A huge part of the confusions come into play because we don't really have a good definition of what we mean by "touching." For this thread, I'll suggest touching be defined as when hard core repulsion becomes non-negligible. (Which, when you think about it, is really an obvious definition.)
 
Last edited:
  • #6
I guess I miscommunicated my question to you guys. I'm not confused about the electric forces between my keyboard and fingers.

What I'm trying to understand is the following:

Imagine two very sharp pencil heads pointing at each other, touching one another. Draw a circle between both tips and zoom in. Repeat this process until you are zoomed in so close that there is a space between them. Now you will say that the electromagnetic forces are jumping this small gap and causing the sensation of "touch", but again, zoom in on the forces themselves.

What you end up with is a seemingly paradoxical gap even between them because you can keep zooming in forever. Yet we still have sensations of touch, and so on. So, at the infinitely smallest scale something has to give and the smallest unit of "information" has to teleport two unimaginably tiny points in space.

Now do you understand my question?
 
  • #7
CyberShot said:
What I'm trying to understand is the following:

Imagine two very sharp pencil heads pointing at each other, touching one another. Draw a circle between both tips and zoom in. Repeat this process ...What you end up with is a seemingly paradoxical gap even between them because you can keep zooming in forever. Yet we still have sensations of touch, and so on. So, at the infinitely smallest scale something has to give and the smallest unit of "information" has to teleport two unimaginably tiny points in space.

Now do you understand my question?

No information is "teleported" from one point in space to the other. There is no action at a distance when we think in terms of fields.

The gap between the pencil tips is spanned by the electromagnetic field, which is the entity that transports the "information" from one tip to the other. The field transports this information at the speed of light, thus everything is ok, in terms of causality. This is what it means to say that the field mediates the interaction between the two objects.
 
  • #8
Ok, but what if you considered, just as an example, only two mediators of the electromagnetic force between each pencil?

Call this m1 (for mediator 1) and m2 particles.

Now, how close can the particles m1 and m2 get? Can they ever "touch"? I don't think so. And if they can't touch, then there has to be again yet another mediator between them.


Thus a mediator, within a mediator? Get my point?


I'm not even sure we're talking physics at this point, maybe my question is more philosophical.
 
  • #9
CyberShot said:
Ok, but what if you considered, just as an example, only two mediators of the electromagnetic force between each pencil?

Call this m1 (for mediator 1) and m2 particles.

Now, how close can the particles m1 and m2 get? Can they ever "touch"? I don't think so. And if they can't touch, then there has to be again yet another mediator between them. Thus a mediator, within a mediator? Get my point?I'm not even sure we're talking physics at this point, maybe my question is more philosophical.

You are getting terminology confused. The mediator of the force is not the particles. The particles experience the force, but the force is mediated by the electromagnetic field.

We are not talking physics or philosophy at this point. Basically, it is just semantics now.

What is your definition of touching? Apparently, it's not when the two objects are close enough to feel a repulsive hard core potential?

CyberShot said:
Thus a mediator, within a mediator? Get my point?

Not at all. Sorry.
 
  • #10
The very idea of "touching" to most people is actually nothing like the real world is. In everyday life we think of things as solid, while in reality things are merely interacting particles and fields with huge empty spaces in most matter. As you get down to the quantum level, there is no such thing as touching. Just varying strengths of fields that interact with everything. Things can occupy the same space if the conditions are right, can pass through other things, and other crazy ideas. Two atoms could never "touch" since there is no such thing.

Now, from what I understand about your orignal question, there might be a smallest distance called the Planck distance. From wikipedia: "In some theories or forms of quantum gravity, it is the length scale at which the structure of spacetime becomes dominated by quantum effects, giving it a discrete or foamy structure, but other theories of quantum gravity predict no such effects."

So who knows...
 
  • #12
some say the Planck length is or may be the smallest possible or at least smallest meaningful distance
 
  • #13
granpa said:
some say the Planck length is or may be the smallest possible or at least smallest meaningful distance

Right.

But the Planck length is much, much smaller than what the OP is asking.


As the electron 'clouds or smears' of the surface atoms of the keyboard and the surface atoms of your fingers come closer, more and more photons are exchanged until the strength of the electromagnetic force is so great that either your finger getssquashed or the keyboard breaks.

If you had the (incredible) strength to actually force the two together to actually result in a 'physical; contact', you'd have a nuclear reaction, which would certainly not be good for your fingers or the keyboard. :D
 
  • #14
  • #15
10 to the -33rd power cm i believe it the Planck length but that would have nothing to do with fingers or the keyboard interaction, this is macroscopic probing not individual atoms. That is referring to the smallest amount of distance, which is known as a meaningful distance on a quantam scale. This relative to the Planck time which is 10 to the -43rd power seconds, the time it takes energy to traverse a Planck length. Messenger particle photons transfer information, creating kinetic energy from potential energy, from the electrons of the keyboard to that of your fingers so no they don't every actually touch. Didnt read the whole thread sorry.
 

1. What is the smallest distance at which we can feel things without touching them?

The smallest distance at which we can feel things without touching them varies depending on the sensitivity of an individual's nervous system and the type of stimulus being felt. Generally, it is believed that the smallest distance is around 0.1mm for sharp and pointed objects, and up to 3mm for dull and smooth objects.

2. How do we feel things without touching them?

We feel things without touching them through a phenomenon known as remote touch or non-contact touch. This occurs when our sensory receptors, such as the nerve endings on our skin, are stimulated by external factors such as air particles, temperature changes, or electromagnetic waves.

3. What are the different types of remote touch?

There are several types of remote touch, including thermal touch, acoustic touch, and electromagnetic touch. Thermal touch involves feeling heat or cold without physical contact, acoustic touch involves feeling vibrations or pressure waves in the air, and electromagnetic touch involves feeling electric or magnetic fields.

4. Is it possible to train our ability to feel things without touching them?

Some studies have shown that it is possible to train our ability to feel things without touching them, particularly in the case of thermal touch. This can be achieved through repeated exposure and practice, which can increase the sensitivity of our nervous system to certain stimuli.

5. How is our sense of touch without physical contact useful?

Our sense of touch without physical contact can be useful in various situations, such as in medicine for diagnosing certain conditions, in industries where workers need to handle sensitive materials without physically touching them, and in everyday life for experiencing virtual or augmented reality environments.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
924
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
817
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
545
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
23
Views
815
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top