Snyder's number

I am interested in the following number which is obtained by concatenting the binary representations of the non-negative integers:

.011011100101110111...

i.e. dot 0 1 10 11 100 101 110 111 ...

This is a little bigger than .43 and I assume it irrational since no pattern of bits repeats forever. I assume that I am not the first to become interested in it, so I wonder if it has already been given a name.
 
Last edited:

arildno

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,848
128
It is actually called Jimmy's snide Remark.
 
arildno said:
It is actually called Jimmy's snide Remark.
Is this a pun on my name, or did I inadvertently say something snide?
 
501
0
when watching that i have a doubt....

once i read in a number theory book that existed a series (i think it was over primes) that gives you a sequence of primes in the form:

[tex] 0.p100p2000p30000p4............. [/tex] or something similar i think it

was related to the calculation of the series [tex] f(x)=\sum_{p}10^{-p} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
The number that I posted has this obvious characteristic: Every finite sequence of 1's and 0's is found in it. Therefore, every idea that can be writen down in finitely many bits is there. For instance, all of the works of Shakespeare are there, complete with typesetting commands. And yet it's just a single irrational number like [itex]\pi[/itex] or e.
 

shmoe

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,993
1
It looks to be one tenth the Champernowne constant, the base 2 version that is. What's usually called the Champernowne constant is the base 10 version, just writing all the numbers in order, 0.123456789101112131415..., and of course you can do this for any base. They're built to be normal numbers (and are of course irrational).
 
81
0
You mean one half of the base 2 Campernowne constant?
 

arildno

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,848
128
jimmysnyder said:
Is this a pun on my name, or did I inadvertently say something snide?
Do you think Newton declared the units of force to be newtons?
Do you think Gauss called Gauss' theorem Gauss' theorem?
 
shmoe said:
It looks to be one tenth the Champernowne constant.
Thanks shmoe, you and this forum are an invaluable resource.
 
arildno said:
Do you think Newton declared the units of force to be newtons?
Do you think Gauss called Gauss' theorem Gauss' theorem?
It was intended as a joke. Sorry you didn't get it.
Newton said:
I assume that I am not the first to become interested in it, so I wonder if it has already been given a name.
 

arildno

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,848
128
Anyhow, it was an interesting number, I'll grant you that.
 

shmoe

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,993
1
Nimz said:
You mean one half of the base 2 Campernowne constant?
I mean the Champernowne constant divided by 10.:tongue:

Thanks for the correction.
 
shmoe said:
I mean the Champernowne constant divided by 10.
According to this article, there is more than one Champernowne constant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champernowne_constant
In particular, the number I spoke of in the original post is in the notation of that site [itex]C_2 / 2[/itex]. I am not concerned about the factor of 1/2, and so I transfer my interest to [itex]C_2[/itex]. Thanks again to everyone for your interest and help.
 

shmoe

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,993
1
jimmysnyder said:
According to this article, there is more than one Champernowne constant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champernowne_constant
In particular, the number I spoke of in the original post is in the notation of that site [itex]C_2 / 2[/itex]. I am not concerned about the factor of 1/2, and so I transfer my interest to [itex]C_2[/itex]. Thanks again to everyone for your interest and help.
That's what I meant by the 'base 2 version'. Divided by 10 was a weak attempt at correcting my one tenth gaff with some binary humour.
 
shmoe said:
That's what I meant by the 'base 2 version'. Divided by 10 was a weak attempt at correcting my one tenth gaff with some binary humour.
There are 10 kinds of people. Those who know binary when they see it and those who don't. I didn't, but now I do.
 
501
0
-I don,t know if Gauss called his law "Gauss Theorem" (perhaps by humility scientist don,t give his name or baptize it with other people name) but Gauss and newton were very arrogant, in fact you will now the "Egregium theorem by Gauss" in latin egregium meaning supreme or best..so i don,t think he was very "humble" ....:) :) :) :)
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top