Origin of the Solar System: Understanding Hydrogen & Heavy Elements

In summary, the popular theory for the origin of the solar system involves a nebula of gas and dust that flattened into a spinning pancake shape with a bulge at the center, forming the sun and the planets. However, the sun is composed mostly of hydrogen and not the denser elements like iron, which should have been pulled to the center by gravitational forces. Some theories suggest that the rocky inner planets may have had thicker atmospheres in the past, allowing them to retain more of the initial hydrogen before it was pushed away by solar wind. Overall, the planets and smaller bodies formed from localized eddies within the collapsing disk of material.
  • #1
johnmtb
4
0
Dear All,I understand that one of the most popular theories concerning the origin of the solar system begins with cloud of gas and dust (called a nebula), assumed to be the remnants of a supernova; in order to explain elements such as iron and above.That this nebula begins to flatten into a spinning pancake shape with a bulge at the center, with the bulge forming the sun and with the various planets condensing out of the rest of the pancake. All of this I can understand and accept.However, why is the sun composed mostly of hydrogen and not the denser elements such as iron and above, which should have headed to the center of the solar system, due to gravitational forces, the same way they did when Earth condensed?Is there any theory on why the sun does not contain the heavy elements and the planets the gaseous elements or or gas molecules?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
There simply is a lot more hydrogen than everything else - a LOT more.
Not only the Sun, but the gas giant planets are predominantly hydrogen.
The sun probably does contain minute traces of heavier elements.
 
  • #3
johnmtb said:
Dear All,I understand that one of the most popular theories concerning the origin of the solar system begins with cloud of gas and dust (called a nebula), assumed to be the remnants of a supernova; in order to explain elements such as iron and above.That this nebula begins to flatten into a spinning pancake shape with a bulge at the center, with the bulge forming the sun and with the various planets condensing out of the rest of the pancake. All of this I can understand and accept.However, why is the sun composed mostly of hydrogen and not the denser elements such as iron and above, which should have headed to the center of the solar system, due to gravitational forces, the same way they did when Earth condensed?Is there any theory on why the sun does not contain the heavy elements and the planets the gaseous elements or or gas molecules?

http://chemistry.about.com/od/geochemistry/a/sunelements.htm

From above:
Elements in the Sun

Element % of total atoms % of total mass
Hydrogen 91.2 71.0
Helium 8.7 27.1
Oxygen 0.078 0.97
Carbon 0.043 0.40
Nitrogen 0.0088 0.096
Silicon 0.0045 0.099
Magnesium 0.0038 0.076
Neon 0.0035 0.058
Iron 0.030 0.014
Sulfur 0.015 0.040
 
  • #4
thank you mathman, but it still does not explain why the earth, at least, has so much iron, etc., or why when we go beyond Mars we run into the gas giants.

gravity forces in the original nebula should have brought all of the heavy elements to the centre of the solar system, while it was still in the particulate stage.
 
  • #5
johnmtb said:
gravity forces in the original nebula should have brought all of the heavy elements t

Not if they are in orbit. The same argument can be applied to the Earth today, right?
 
  • #8
johnmtb said:
thank you mathman, but it still does not explain why the earth, at least, has so much iron, etc., or why when we go beyond Mars we run into the gas giants.
The rocky inner planets probably did have thicker atmosphere including a lot of hydrogen in the earliest stages of formation.
Free hydrogen though, being very light is easily pushed away over time by solar wind leaving the remaining 10% of heavier material to agglomerate.
In the case of gas giants, their much greater gravity enabled them to hold on to more of the initial hydrogen
 
  • #9
Guys,

thank you all for your responses. however, I am still not certain that the question has been answered. I shall always feel that there is something amiss with the current theory.
 
  • #10
In a sense what you are saying is 'why are there planets?, why didn't everything simply just collapse into a central star?
Well in fact most of the nebula, over 99% of it, did just that.
The planets and other smaller bodies formed from relatively small localised eddies of matter within the broadly collapsing disk of material.
 
  • #11
rootone,

maybe that is the answer. assuming that the heavier elements were homogenous in the original nebula, and mercury, venus, Earth and Mars are only more dense because the lighter elements have been blown away by the sun.
 

What is the origin of the solar system?

The solar system is believed to have formed approximately 4.6 billion years ago from a giant molecular cloud of dust and gas. The collapse of this cloud was triggered by a nearby supernova explosion, leading to the formation of our Sun and the surrounding planets, moons, and other objects.

What role did hydrogen play in the formation of the solar system?

Hydrogen, being the most abundant element in the universe, played a crucial role in the formation of the solar system. It was the main component of the molecular cloud from which the solar system formed, and its gravitational pull helped to attract other elements and particles to form the Sun and the other planets.

How were heavy elements formed in the solar system?

Heavy elements, such as carbon, oxygen, and iron, were formed through nuclear fusion reactions in the cores of massive stars that existed before our Sun. When these stars exploded in supernova events, they released these heavy elements into space, which eventually became part of the molecular cloud that gave rise to our solar system.

What is the significance of heavy elements in the solar system?

Heavy elements are essential for the formation of rocky planets like Earth. They also play a critical role in the development of life, as they are necessary for the formation of molecules such as water and organic compounds. Without heavy elements, our solar system and life as we know it would not exist.

How do scientists study the origin of the solar system?

Scientists use a combination of observations, computer simulations, and laboratory experiments to study the origin of the solar system. They observe other stars and planetary systems to gain insights into how our own system may have formed. They also use computer simulations to model different scenarios for the formation of the solar system. Lastly, they conduct experiments in laboratories to recreate the extreme conditions that existed during the early stages of the solar system's formation.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
966
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top