Solve the following equation x^2 – x < 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomcenjerrym
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality x^2 – x < 0, it can be factored to x(x – 1) < 0. The critical points are x = 0 and x = 1, where the function changes sign. Testing intervals shows that the inequality holds for values between 0 and 1, specifically 0 < x < 1. Values less than 0 and greater than 1 do not satisfy the inequality. Thus, the solution set is {x | 0 < x < 1}.
tomcenjerrym
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Does anyone can solve the following equation

x^2 – x < 0

Here is the solutions of mine:

x^2 – x < 0
x(x – 1) < 0
x < 0, x < 1

Please advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tomcenjerrym said:
x^2 – x < 0
x(x – 1) < 0
x < 0, x < 1

To get from line 2 to line 3, you're acting like this is an equality -- it's not. Try graphing y = x^2 - x and you'll see the answer directly -- then factoring like you did will help you get the exact answer.
 
Best way to handle general inequalities: solve the equation first:
To solve x2- x< 0, solve x2- x= x(x- 1)= 0. The solutions are, of course, x=0 and x= 1. Since f(x)= x2- x is continuous (all polynomials are continuous), those are the only places where the function can change sign. If x= -1 (-1< 0), (-1)2- (-1)= 2> 0. That tells us that all values of x less than 0 make x2- x positive. That does not satisfy the inequality so no value of x< 0 can. Take x= 1/2 (between 0 and 1). (1/2)2- (1/2)= 1/4- 1/2= -1/4< 0. That tells us that all values of x between 0 and 1 make x2- x negative. That satifies the inequality. Finally, take x= 2 (2> 1). 22- 2= 4-2= 2> 0. That tells us that all values of x larger than 1 make x2- x positive. That does not satisfy the inequality so no value of x larger than 1 does. The solution set for x2- x= 0 is {x| 0< x< 1}.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top