Solve x^x=x

  • Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date
  • #1
459
5
How would you solve
[tex]x^x = ax[/tex]
for x (where a is any postive constant >1)?

I am trying the Lambert W function but I just can't get it to the right form. I am starting to think that you can't solve this using the Lambert W function. Any help?

edit: Sorry, I really wanted the expression to be x^x = a*x
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,784
18
You're looking for solutions to [itex]x^x=cx[/itex].

Set x=a+ib=|x|exp(i[itex]\Phi[/itex]) and look to solutions to

[tex]|x|\exp(i\Phi)^{a+ib}=|x|\exp(i\Phi)[/tex]

knowing that two complex numbers are equal iff their modulus are equal and their phase differ by at most a factor of 2n[itex]\pi[/itex], [itex]n\in \mathbb{Z}[/itex]. For instance, I find that the condition of equality of modulus imposes the following relation btw a,b and c

[tex]\frac{b-ab}{2}\ln(a^2+b^2)\tan^{-1}(b/a)=c[/tex]

The condition on the phase will restrict the possible solutions some more.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,784
18
I have a little doubt about what I wrote though because I don't remember how a complex number raised to a complex number "looks" like but I think

[tex](e^{z})^w=e^{wz}[/tex]

is correct.
 
  • #4
459
5
quasar987 said:
[tex]\frac{b-ab}{2}\ln(a^2+b^2)\tan^{-1}(b/a)=c[/tex]

The condition on the phase will restrict the possible solutions some more.
I don't know how is this going to help. Instead of having one equation and one unknown we would now have two equations and two unknowns. And it doesn't seem like this approach is going to be any easy looking how the a's and b's are "trapped" inside.
 
  • #5
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,784
18
Wheter you find it pretty or not it's the solution nonetheless. If you give that to a computer, he will indiscriminately find all solutions in a fraction of second.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
367
0
quasar987 said:
Wheter you find it pretty or not it's the solution nonetheless. If you give that to a computer, he will indiscriminatorily find all solutions in a fraction of second.
That's the only clever way to go here.
Closed form solution is impossible for this equation I think.Just numerically ,and it depends on constant [tex]a[/tex].
 
  • #7
459
5
So it is NOT possible to use the Lambert W function here. I mean, we can use the Lambert W function to find a closed-form solution to the equation x^x = a. But we can't, supposedly, solve for x^x=ax using the same function?

Anyways, does anyone have clever way to solve this equation in CLOSED-FORM?
 
  • #8
367
0
Possible or not,this equation can't be solved explicitly.I haven't worked with "W" function much in past ,but I think you are right:
X^(X)=a is one thing and X^(X-1)=a quite another one.
There are numerical methods though.
Some may be better suited for this type of equation (ie. faster convergence) than others. It depends what precision you want.
 

Related Threads on Solve x^x=x

  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
31K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
25K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
6K
Top