Solving equation

  • Thread starter hamamo
  • Start date
  • #1
hamamo
14
0
hi there;
please can anyone help me solving this
3((e^x)-1)-xe^x=0
sorry i couldn't use more elegant form to write the equation
i use some software and they help
but i can't do it in hand
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
sutupidmath
1,631
4
hi there;
please can anyone help me solving this
3((e^x)-1)-xe^x=0
sorry i couldn't use more elegant form to write the equation
i use some software and they help
but i can't do it in hand

[tex]3(e^{x}-1)-xe^{x}=0 [/tex] I do not believe you can solve this one algebraically, one can only approximate the solution to these kind of equations.
 
  • #3
Marco_84
173
0
i think a graphical method is usefull...

ciao
 

Attachments

  • equations.jpg
    equations.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 320
  • #4
hamamo
14
0
thanx for the reply up there
but i search more and i found this kind of equation can be solved using
Lambart w-function
or omega function, the problem i couldn't have more information about this function else some expansion series and i can't even write a code to solve or to find a value in lambart function
any more help will be useful
thanx
 
  • #5
hamamo
14
0
[tex]3(e^{x}-1)-xe^{x}=0 [/tex] I do not believe you can solve this one algebraically, one can only approximate the solution to these kind of equations.

can you help me using the latex
 
  • #6
TheoMcCloskey
185
3
By inspection we can see x=0 is a solution. Do you have any reasoning to believe there are other solutions?

Edit = maybe I was to hasty - there seems that there is at least one more solution.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
43,021
970
[tex]3(e^{x}-1)-xe^{x}=0 [/tex] I do not believe you can solve this one algebraically, one can only approximate the solution to these kind of equations.

can you help me using the latex
If you click on the formula, you will see the code in a new window.
 
  • #8
hamamo
14
0
tanx for the reply
the 0 solution i know about it
and there is another solution if you graph the equation you can find it approximately
its about 2.something
 
  • #9
hamamo
14
0
by the way
this equation is a result for the Blanck's low and Wien's displacement low
i want to calculate the Wien's constant at the maximum wave length of black body radiation
so
i differentiate Blanck's low and solve the equation for which x have a maximum value
and the result is something like this equation
which now i need to solve for x to find max and min value
 
  • #10
coomast
279
1
thanx for the reply up there
but i search more and i found this kind of equation can be solved using
Lambart w-function
or omega function, the problem i couldn't have more information about this function else some expansion series and i can't even write a code to solve or to find a value in lambart function
any more help will be useful
thanx

Hello Hamamo, if you want some code to calculate the Lambert W function, you might consider using the definition of it and the method of Newton-Raphson. The definition as you might know is:

[tex]X=Ye^Y \qquad \rightarrow \qquad Y=W(X)[/tex]

Thus if you define a function f as:

[tex]f=Ye^Y-X[/tex]

You can use the method of Newton Raphson to be for calculating this function:

[tex]Y_{n+1}=Y_n-\frac{Y_ne^{Y_n}-X}{e^{Y_n}(Y_n+1)}[/tex]

Or:

[tex]Y_{n+1}=\frac{e^{Y_n}Y_n^2+X}{e^{Y_n}(Y_n+1)}[/tex]

Take 0 as start value and use this iterative scheme to calculate the solution as the resulting value of the Lambert W function. It converges extremely fast. 5 iterations for the value of the function you are looking to solve.

best regards, Coomast

[Edit] The results of the iteration if you use it on your function:
step n Yn Yn+1
1 0 -0.149361
2 -0.149361 -0.177647
3 -0.177647 -0.178560
4 -0.178560 -0.178561
5 -0.178561 -0.178561

Which is x-3, thus x=2.821439 is the one you need
 
Last edited:
  • #11
hamamo
14
0
thanx coomast
you r helpfull that's what i need
thanx again
 

Suggested for: Solving equation

Replies
3
Views
339
Replies
6
Views
655
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
645
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
708
Replies
2
Views
330
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
262
Replies
2
Views
487
Replies
4
Views
321
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
421
  • Last Post
Replies
33
Views
2K
Top