Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Solving Exponential Equations Using Logarithms

  1. Jan 16, 2004 #1


    User Avatar


    The following problem is bothering me quite a bit. It is...

    3 x 2^x = 12

    The Unit this question is in is about solving exponential equations through expressing each side as a power of the same base, by taking a base (x) logarithm of each side or taking a base 10 logarithm of each side.

    The answer is supposed to be 2. Here are my calculations.

    3 x 2^x = 12
    log 3 + xlog 2 = log 12
    x(log 3 - log 2) = log 12
    xlog 3/2 = log 12
    x = log 12 / log 2/3

    Now this is incorrect for probably more then one reason. I've had success doing the questions of the form... 3^3x-1 = 9^2x. But when they introduced multiplication on the left side of the eq I got lost. Also I noticed that 3 or 2 cannot have a whole number exponent to make 12. Confusion is upon me. Thanks for the help in advance!
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 16, 2004 #2
    How u reached x(log 3 - log 2) = log 12 from
    log 3 + xlog 2 = log 12
  4. Jan 16, 2004 #3


    User Avatar

    I was trying to work along with the text books' example but the question didn't follow mine very closely.
  5. Jan 16, 2004 #4
    As was stated, this is where you go wrong:

    You can not factor x out of the log(3) term... since it has no factor of x in it! And what's up with the minus sign?

    The correct way to do it is something like this:

    log(3) + xlog(2) = log(12)
    xlog(2) = log(12) - log(3)
    xlog(2) = log(12/3)
    x = log(4)/log(2) = log(2^2)/log(2) = 2log(2)/log(2) = 2

    However, a simpler/better way is this:

    3 * 2^x = 12
    2^x = 12/3 = 4
    2^x = 2^2
    x = 2

    Last edited: Jan 16, 2004
  6. Jan 16, 2004 #5
    the main thing you should focus on is getting x by itself, right off

    so from [tex](3)2^x = 12[/tex], you should bring the 3 over to the right side, and then use logarithms to separate the 2 and the x. Then you can bring the 2 over, isolating x. Also remember that [tex]log (X^y) = (y)(log X)[/tex], although I think you already know this from the stuff you did. Try this and if you still can't get it post back.
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2004
  7. Jan 16, 2004 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    One unfortunate complication is that you used "x" to mean two different things. My first reaction when I saw "3 x 2^x = 12" is that you can't do this using logarithms since you have x both in the exponent and not in the exponent! Then I realized that the first "x" is times. It would be better to write the equation either as
    "3*2^x= 12" using "*" for times or to just write 3(2^x)= 12.

    As has been pointed out, you are correct that
    log(3)+ x log(2)= log 12. Your error is in then writing
    "x(log 3 - log 2)= log 12". That would be the same as
    "xlog(3)+ xlog(2)= log 12". What you should do from
    log(3)+ x log(2)= log 12 is subtract log(3) from both sides:
    x log(2)= log(12)- log(3)= log(12/3)= log(4).

    Actually, the way I would be inclined to do the problem is to divide by the "3" first: Dividing both sides of 3(2^x)= 12 gives 2^x= 4. You should then be able to recognize that 2^2= 4 so x= 2. That is, in a sense, using logarithms because it uses the basic definition of logarithm. Given that a^x= a^b, it follows that x= b because we know that a^x is a one-to-one function: it HAS an inverse. Saying that x= b is the same as using the inverse on both sides of the equation and the inverse IS the logarithm.
  8. Jan 16, 2004 #7
    however, he will not always be able to come to those conclusions because x will not always be that simple. I suggest that instead of the last steps being:

    2^x = 4
    2^x = 2^2

    you instead do this:

    [tex]log 2^x = log 4[/tex]
    [tex]x(log 2) = log 4[/tex]
    [tex]x = \frac{\log 2}{log 4}[/tex]
  9. Jan 16, 2004 #8
    it should be
    [tex]x = \frac{\log 4}{log 2}[/tex]
  10. Jan 17, 2004 #9
    ack, sorry, the latex code was annoying me a bit and I must have accidently switched them
  11. Jan 17, 2004 #10


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yes, it is true that if the problem were for example, 3*2x= 9, then it reduces to 2x= 3 and so x log(2)= log(3) so x= log(3)/log(2).

    However, in my opinion, it is much better to understand that logarithm means the exponent. I suspect that the whole point of the problem 3(2x)= 12 was to recognize that this is the same as 2x= 22 rather than to mindlessly apply a formula.
  12. Jan 19, 2004 #11


    User Avatar

    Wow. I actually understand this now. You all have my many thanks and my praise. I can continue with my work finally. This is the best response for help I've recieved yet. :smile:
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook