Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've been trying to solve

[itex]\frac{\partial \vec{u}(x,y,z,t)}{\partial t} = \nu \nabla^2 \vec{u}(x,y,z,t)[/itex]

Where the Laplacian is 3-d. My initial conditions are

[itex]\vec{u}(x,y,z,0)=\vec{u_o}(x,y,z)[/itex].

And my BC is that

[itex](u_z,v_z,w)= 0 [/itex] at z=0. where [itex]\vec{u} = (u,v,w)[/itex]

I want to solve for [itex]\vec{u}(x,y,0,t)[/itex] i.e. at z=0.

Here, [itex] (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}, z \in (-\infty,0), t\in \mathbb{R}^+ [/itex].

Is there an analytic way to do this? So far I have only come across numerical schemes or examples for lower dimensions.

Any suggestions would be appreciated,

Nick

Nick

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Solving the 3-d heat equation

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Solving heat equation | Date |
---|---|

Why does this "clearly" solve the heat equation? | Nov 6, 2015 |

Solving the heat equation with complicated boundary conditions | Mar 10, 2014 |

Solving non homogeneous heat equation | Dec 4, 2013 |

Solving Heat Equation by Fourier Transform | Oct 11, 2013 |

Resources for Solving Heat Equation | Jun 21, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**