Solving this differential equation

  • Thread starter Moneer81
  • Start date

while working on a simple mechanics problem using polar coordinates, I got this equation

second derivative of phi = (-g/R) sin phi

now I need to solve this to get an equation for phi (t) but the books says that I cannot solve this using elementary functions and that the solution will be the more complex Jacobi elliptic function. My question is why can't I integrate twice to get the equation for phi (t) ?

thanks a lot


You can't just straight integrate that differential equation. I'm not even sure how one would attempt it. Here's one way to set up the elliptic integral:

Multiply through by [tex] \dot{\phi} [/tex] and get the differential equation
[tex]\ddot{\phi} \dot{\phi} = -g/R \dot{\phi} sin \phi [/tex]
which we recognize as being the first time derivative of
[tex]\dot{\phi}^2 = g/R cos \phi + C [/tex]
when then leads to the integral:
[tex]\int d\phi ~ 1/\sqrt{g/R cos \phi + C} = t - t_0[/tex]
which is then the elliptic integral left behind. This is why we make things like the small angle approximation, where applicable. If you're working with exact numbers, you could pretty simply write a numerical algorithm
MalleusScientiarum ,

why can't we straight integrate it with respect to time ?
ok never mind....stupid question. i know why :)

James R

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Yeah - because it's sine of phi, not sine of t.


Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
In post #2, you missed a little "2" when going from [itex] \dot{\phi}\ddot{\phi} [/itex] to the square of the first derivative.

i guess theylor expansion is the best choice


I advise numerical analysis.

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads