Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Some basic definition questions of set theory

  1. Apr 20, 2004 #1
    I have to prove the following theorem,

    1) If f:A->B is a surjection, and g:B->C is a surjection then g dot f:a->C is a surjection

    Well this makes sense and I am not sure how to PROVE it

    Is it sufficient to say the following

    if for every element b of B, there exists a element a of A such that f(a)=b and same for B->C for g(b)=c is true, Then

    for every element of c in C, there must exist an a of A such that g(f(a))=c since for every b in B there exists f(a)=b, and we know g(b)= c is true for every element of c,
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 21, 2004 #2

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes that's the right idea though the phrase 'we know g(b)=c is true for every..' is, erm, not what you want to write, but I think that is just the sentence structure nothing more.

    You must show that for all c in C, there is an a in A such that gf(a)=c, which is what you've done.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Some basic definition questions of set theory