• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Some Simple Questions (Invertibility, Relations)

  • Thread starter Seda
  • Start date
71
0
1. Homework Statement

A.) Jon wants to define a function f: A->B as invertible iff for all a in A and all b in B with f(a)=b, there exists a function g:B->A for which g(b)=a.

Is that reasonable?


B.) Determine Whether the relation ~ on the Real Numbers defined by x~y is reflexive, symmetric, or transitive.

1.) x~y iff xy<= 0
2.) x~y iff xy < 0





2. Homework Equations

None really, except maybe a definition for invertible.



3. The Attempt at a Solution
this seems to make sense, but it seems odd to answer a math question with a "yes" and move on. Am I missing something about the defininition of invertibility that makes the statement in the question incorrect?

For B, these questions seem really easy, but they also seem to be exactly the same. Both relations seem to be Symmetric only....because x^2 is not less than zero for all real values, and the counterexample x=-1, y=1, z=-1 proves that both aren't transitive. AM i missing something?
 

Answers and Replies

Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
A) looks a little subtle. Think about it. For one thing the quantifiers smell wrong. You said for all a and b there exists a function g. Jon didn't say that the g should be the same for ALL choices of a and b. Second, worry about the case where f isn't onto (surjective). What is your definition of 'invertible'? B) looks pretty reasonable to me.
 

Related Threads for: Some Simple Questions (Invertibility, Relations)

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
873
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
926
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
966
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
944
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
Top