- 71

- 0

**1. Homework Statement**

*A.) Jon wants to define a function f: A->B as invertible iff for all a in A and all b in B with f(a)=b, there exists a function g:B->A for which g(b)=a.*

Is that reasonable?

Is that reasonable?

*B.) Determine Whether the relation ~ on the Real Numbers defined by x~y is reflexive, symmetric, or transitive.*

1.) x~y iff xy<= 0

2.) x~y iff xy < 0

1.) x~y iff xy<= 0

2.) x~y iff xy < 0

**2. Homework Equations**

None really, except maybe a definition for invertible.

**3. The Attempt at a Solution**

this seems to make sense, but it seems odd to answer a math question with a "yes" and move on. Am I missing something about the defininition of invertibility that makes the statement in the question incorrect?

For B, these questions seem really easy, but they also seem to be exactly the same. Both relations seem to be Symmetric only....because x^2 is not less than zero for all real values, and the counterexample x=-1, y=1, z=-1 proves that both aren't transitive. AM i missing something?