so the paradox goes like this.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

if n grains of sand is a heap, then n-1 grains of sand is a heap.

with the justification being that you can't destroy a heap by removing a single grain of sand.

is it just me or does this sound like bullcrap, as this would imply 0 grains is a heap and in turn -1 grains of sand is a heap doesn't this seem like we either have to accept that a heap is defined by that statement, or take it as a theorem of a heap hich can easily be shown to be false.

I spent part of a Q&A session with a lecturer trying to convince him that there is no paradox here, and he did not budge. Any thoughts?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sorites paradox

Loading...

Similar Threads for Sorites paradox | Date |
---|---|

Is Zeno's paradox valid | Jun 5, 2015 |

Interesting number paradox | Nov 14, 2013 |

Double-on-coin-flip paradox | Nov 11, 2013 |

The Sorites heap paradox | May 1, 2003 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**