Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sorry but this is another question about PMM.

  1. Apr 29, 2012 #1
    Can perpetual motion machine not produce extra energy just be 100% efficient and still be considered a perpetual motion machine?

    I understand the laws of thermodynamics states that a machine cannot make more energy than it uses. But theoretically if you remove all the losses and have a 100% efficient machine could I call it a PMM or it has to produce more energy to be called a PMM.

    This question is purely whether or not can I call it a PMM.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 29, 2012 #2

    phinds

    User Avatar
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    A PMM (which does not exist) does work. Your hypothetical machine (which ALSO does not exist --- there's no such thing as zero load) does no work so it is not a PMM
     
  4. Apr 29, 2012 #3
    This doesn't answers my question.

    I know that It doesn't exist and I'm not claiming anything. I do not need people saying "it is impossible" or "does not exist" or "there is no such things". I simply want to know whether or not can I call 100% efficient machine a PMM.
     
  5. Apr 29, 2012 #4

    phinds

    User Avatar
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Since there isn't any such thing, I'm not at all clear that it MATTERS what you call it.

    As I specifically said in my post, a PMM does work and yours doesn't so yours isn't a PMM. Was that not clear?
     
  6. Apr 29, 2012 #5

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    I think that, by definition, a PMM has to output more work than is input. So a machine that just breaks even is not a PMM.
     
  7. Apr 29, 2012 #6

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    See the wiki for pmm: it defines several types.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Sorry but this is another question about PMM.
  1. Another question (Replies: 1)

Loading...