1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sound wave interference

  1. Mar 1, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Consider two sound sources S1 with a frequency of

    f1 = 3367 Hz

    and S2 with a frequency of

    f2 = 3362 Hz.

    Determine the smallest difference in frequency from 3367 Hz that the average person can detect?

    2. Relevant equations
    The only thing I can think of is approximating the ear as a closed tube, so f=nv/4L. Also, beat f = 5Hz.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I'm honestly completely clueless here. I've never heard of a formula that deals with this and I can't find anything online. Is there an actual formula that I can use here? Maybe something related to the beat vs the fundamental frequency of the ear?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 1, 2016 #2
    If two sources of sound having slightly different frequency are sent say before an observer with say his ears as detectors
    then he can find the difference in frequencies - say n1=480 and n2 =484 by hearing the superposition produced by those waves which are waxing and waning of sound per sec - these are called ' beats' - i know your frequencies are in audible range ;
    for details you see
    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/beat.html
     
  4. Mar 1, 2016 #3

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Same with me. Is your problem statement the litteral rendering ? It seems so strange and the last sentence almost disconnected from the first part.

    Does this part of your text talk about beats ? Then the 'two sources' part suggests you should interpret this as asking what is the lowest beat frequency you can distinguish.

    But if the material is about physiology, the term 'pitch resolution' is much more logical. Also to be found at hyperphysics . But I don't know how to translate the resolution from 1 Hz at 440 Hz to 3367 Hz...
     
  5. Mar 1, 2016 #4
    OK here is a factual piece of information. The human ear can differentiate between two frequencies if their difference is greater than 16Hz.

    So our hero here cannot differentiate between the two given frequencies. Thus the minimum difference in frequency will be 16-(3367-3362)= 11Hz.
     
  6. Mar 1, 2016 #5

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Any references ? Is 60 - 76 Hz equally distinguishable as 11000 - 11016 Hz ?

    And what is this 11 Hz ?

    Link in post #3 "The normal human ear can detect the difference between 440 Hz and 441 Hz" .
     
  7. Mar 1, 2016 #6
    There is a small elaboration : The human ear can differentiate between two frequencies which occur simultaneously if their difference is greater than 16 Hz. This implies that the human ear can detect the phenomenon of beats only if the difference between the two frequencies is 16 Hz.

    Thus, whether our hero can distinguish between these two frequencies depends on whether they are occurring simultaneously or separately. The 440 Hz and 441 Hz example is correct because they occur separately .

    If in the question, the frequencies appear simultaneously, then the hero's ear cannot detect them separately. If f2 is increased by 11 Hz, then the difference between f1 and f2 (new) is now 16 Hz and the ear can now detect the two as different.

    If both the frequencies appear separately, then we need to obtain the minimum change in frequency the ear can measure.
     
  8. Mar 1, 2016 #7
    Yeah, that's the whole thing. This is for a student I'm helping, so I didn't have access to the text while we were working, but there was absolutely no context in the questions around it. Not a clue here.
     
  9. Mar 1, 2016 #8
    well in our experience in the labs the no. of peaks of intensity of sound after superposition could be counted per sec if the difference is a few only say 2 or 3 - that we did by applying a bit of wax on the tuning fork of one frequency out of a pair of identical freq. tuning forks.This is waxing and waning of sound Intensity and is not related to exact frequency observations. to hear sixteen changes is two much.
     
  10. Mar 1, 2016 #9

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    There seems to be some confusion in the thread between pitch differences that can be detected in tones played serially and in tones played concurrently. If concurrent, I see no reason for a lower limit of detection to exist. Maybe after a couple of days the listener might be unsure of the orginal loudness.
    For serially, at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychoacoustics it says a difference of 3.6Hz for the octave 1000-2000Hz. Given the logarithmic nature of musical scales, it does seem likely that the discernible difference will vary according to the absolute frequencies, though perhaps not linearly.
    As for the question as stated, it is fairly evident that something has been left out.

    I agree with BvU that the calculation in post #4 arriving at 11Hz makes no sense.
     
  11. Mar 1, 2016 #10
    My reference is a book titled Concepts of Physics- 1. Its by Dr HC Verma and is quite popular here in India... though I doubt it is internationally recognized.
    @haruspex did you go through post #6? I elaborated on how the 11Hz was achieved. Could you ecplain why it didnt make sense?
     
  12. Mar 1, 2016 #11
    Which frequencies did you use for the tining forks?

    EDIT: It does not matter.Im sorry. I didnt see that you used identival tuning forks.
     
  13. Mar 1, 2016 #12
    well its about 30 yrs back- as i remember ......but some frequencies like 256, 482....something around 324 were in use.
    Moreover there was one Sonometer experiment alongside -which utilized a stretched wire of variable length and when the frequency of a tuning fork matched with stretched wire there was resonance - but near the exact resonance when the frequencies were close but differed by a small number only- we could hear the beats
     
  14. Mar 2, 2016 #13

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    I can see that it makes sense if you interpret the question as "how much would you have to increase the 3367 by so that it can be distinguished from 3362?" But since the question does not say that or anything very much like it, that does not seem a very fruitful avenue.
    If we just look at the explicit question
    there is no mention of 3362.

    With regard to the discrimination of tones played together, maybe you have it backwards. If two equal amplitude tones differ by 1Hz, reliably, I will hear them beating from full cancellation to full reinforcement and back once a second. That would be very easy to detect. It would be somewhat harder at 16Hz.
    For this reason, I feel sure the question is supposed to be in respect of tones played consecutively.
     
  15. Mar 2, 2016 #14
    OK I am sorry. I made a mistake in reading the text properly. The text I mentioned before says

    "The beat frequency must not be greater than 16 Hz."

    I read it wrong. I hope I'm forgiven. OK, now the question makes no sense. I'm with haruspex on this one. Sorry for bothering you BvU.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Sound wave interference
Loading...