- #246
nikkkom
- 2,075
- 399
NROL-76 footage has the first complete uninterrupted video of first stage flight, through MECO, boostback, flyback and landing. And it's jaw-dropping.
That is what I understand also, a first from the southern Hemisphere.mfb said:it will be the first orbital launch from the southern hemisphere.
That is a shame, I thought the technical webcast was much better than the hosted. NASA is devoting considerable time on their site but seem to be spreading it out over several hours. Curious how their launch coverage will differ from the youtube webcast.mfb said:SpaceX merged both webcasts to one.
I have been watching it, very cool idea, I've often wondered what it would look like or if it would even be visible from Europe. On Sunday evening I get a very good 5 minute pass and I'll watch to see if Dragon is visible as it goes over.mfb said:
lol, I just got it from a friend in Germany also, was going to post it but you beat me to it.mfb said:
True enough, hope it doesn't get to the point that routine leads do extra risk. Any word on visibility from Europe?mfb said:Yeah, landing is getting routine.
In a year reflights will get routine.
Especially if they get the contract.1oldman2 said:It appears that SpaceX is serious about the "competition is good for business" thing.
I can't wait for that one, last I had heard they didn't even have a payload selected. (That would launch a lot of cheese wheels )mfb said:We'll see what they try with the FH maiden flight.
I believe it's a "Done deal"mfb said:Especially if they get the contract.
Now that's interestingmfb said:They seem to collect US government agencies. NASA (as Dragon customer), NOAA (DSCOVR), NRO (weird ISS-approaching military satellite), Air Force (X-37B, later GPS satellites), what is next?
How to spot that the article was written by someone from the US:1oldman2 said:https://phys.org/news/2017-06-opini...e=menu&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=item-menu
Mars 3 did achieve a soft landing and sent data for 15 seconds (including a very grainy picture) - more than 4 years before Viking 1.The USSR's Mars 2 orbited Mars for three months in 1971 but its lander module crashed onto the planet. The lander of the Mars 3 mission also failed.
NASA's Viking 1 performed the first successful landing on Mars, on July 20, 1976, followed by Viking 2 on September 3, 1976.
Rocket science seems to require a lot of patience, maybe a "double header" launch next weekend will make up for the wait.mfb said:They have to repair a valve, the next launch opportunity is the 23rd.
The weather forecast for the next two days was bad anyway.
The story I linked in #274 gives it even odds on either launch, (for what that's worth) If SpaceX pulls off the double launch it's going to be a great PR Coup after the recent re-use success.mfb said:I'm not sure if they can do that.
Looks like the two teams are not completely independent.It is understood that SpaceX can support major operations, e.g. launch attempts or Static Fire Tests that are one day apart but capabilities are not yet in place to support same-day launches from the East and West Coast.
That has got to change soon, considering the planned launch schedule as well as the Texas site coming online soon (I notice SES is planning on two of their Satellites being launched from Boca Chica Beach). I would imagine that either the Hawthorne facilities is going to get a major expansion or will get an East coast counterpart before long.mfb said:Looks like the two teams are not completely independent.