- #1

- 13

- 0

- Thread starter athrax
- Start date

- #1

- 13

- 0

- #2

Chris Hillman

Science Advisor

- 2,345

- 8

Athrax, physics is complicated and misunderstandings can easily arise if you are not very careful to use technical terms correctly. There is a reason why physicists use all those funky words---- under some circumstances, nature doesn't work like everyday intuition might lead one to expect, so physicists have devised mathematical theories and technical words to discuss those theories. It's important, when you ask a question about effect E in theory T, to state the name of theory T and effect E, if at all possible.

If I were to guess, I'd guess that you might be asking about "time dilation" in "the theory of special relativity" (str). Does that sound right? (My expectation is that this might jog your memory; if not, ask again and we'll try to figure out the question.)

Last edited:

- #3

mathman

Science Advisor

- 7,877

- 453

- #4

Wallace

Science Advisor

- 1,251

- 0

The idea you are referring to comes from the theory of Relativity. The tricky bit to grasp is that to comprehend it, you need to do away with the notion of any absolute time. All you can talk about is how fast

If you were in a train moving at close to the speed of light past a station, you could look at your watch and see that compared to a clock sitting at the station, your watch 'ticks' faster. Therefore as far as you are concerned, time runs slower for people on the station.

However this is not universal, so you can't say 'time goes slower on the station' but only that '

In both cases people on the train and the platform see each others time ticking slower than their own! This is why you can only talk about how things are seen by various observers, but not whether time runs fast or slow in some absolute sense.

- #5

- 94

- 0

- #6

- 28

- 0

True. Simply put, a denser mass will have a more negative gravitational potential and will thus slow down any clock in its gravity field. One have to be careful in understanding the slowing down of clocksw stuff. One is put forward by special relativity where the proximity of a moving vehicle to the speed of light alters the ticking of clocks and the other has to do with general relativity which I first mentioned.

- #7

- 2

- 0

Exactly!! Refer Roger Penrose's Emperor's New Mind..

- #8

- 8

- 0

Since moving closer to the speed of light slows your time down wouldn't the clocks and people at the station appear to be moving quicker not slower?If you were in a train moving at close to the speed of light past a station, you could look at your watch and see that compared to a clock sitting at the station, your watch 'ticks' faster. Therefore as far as you are concerned, time runs slower for people on the station.

se.

Last edited:

- #9

- 16,552

- 6,921

I think you're missing the point. Moving fast does NOT slow down your time in any absolute sense. There IS no absolute sense. You and the train station observer BOTH see your own time and movement as perfectly normal and you both see the SAME apparent slowdown in the time being experienced by the other.Since moving closer to the speed of light slows your time down wouldn't the clocks and people at the station appear to be moving quicker not slower?

- Last Post

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 2K